Rocket Mortgage Hit with Class Action After Ignoring Opt-Out Requests

Legal gavel on documents

Rocket Mortgage is facing fresh legal trouble as a new lawsuit accuses the lender of continuing telemarketing outreach even after confirming that a consumer had successfully opted out. Filed November 12 in federal court in Florida, the complaint alleges violations of both federal and state telemarketing laws—and marks the 56th TCPA-related case brought against the company.

Key Claim: Rocket allegedly called a consumer twelve times after confirming she had been removed from future communications.

The Consumer’s Experience

Hillary Wissart of Kissimmee, Florida, says she visited RocketMortgage.com on October 9 to check mortgage rates. Just hours later, she received a voicemail from a representative identifying himself as Miguel Rodriguez, followed by a text message welcoming her to her “home financing journey” and offering an opt‑out option by replying “STOP.”

Wissart sent the STOP request immediately. Rocket responded with a confirmation: “You have successfully been unsubscribed. You will not receive any more messages from this number.”

But the calls allegedly continued.

Timeline of Events

  • Oct 9: Initial call and text from Rocket representative.
  • Oct 9 (3:51 PM): Wissart sends STOP request; receives confirmation.
  • Oct 10–29: Multiple calls from the same number, including Oct 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, and 29.
  • Oct 23: Second voicemail left by the representative.

Compliance Concerns

Federal telemarketing regulations require companies to honor do‑not‑call requests within ten business days. The lawsuit claims Rocket failed to maintain proper internal procedures for honoring consumer opt‑outs, as all calls and messages allegedly originated from the same number—indicating the STOP request likely never propagated through their system.

Wissart is not a Rocket customer and uses her phone strictly for personal communication. Her filing also notes that Rocket has been sued 55 prior times for alleged TCPA violations, raising continued questions about the company’s compliance infrastructure.

The Class Action Scope

Wissart seeks to represent two groups:

  • Nationwide consumers who sent an opt‑out text but received more than one subsequent call.
  • Florida residents who received any calls after opting out.

The complaint estimates that more than 10,000 people may qualify.

Potential Penalties

The case invokes both the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Florida’s Telephone Solicitation Act. These laws carry statutory penalties of $500 per unlawful call—and up to $1,500 if the violations are deemed willful.

Industry Takeaway

For mortgage lenders and other lead‑driven industries, the lawsuit highlights ongoing challenges with managing suppression lists and maintaining compliant outreach workflows across call, text, and digital channels. As marketing automation expands, clean data hygiene and synchronized opt‑out systems remain essential.

Rocket Mortgage has not yet filed a response, and no court has made any determination regarding the allegations.

More Articles

Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!

Exploring Washington, D.C.’s Premier Real Estate Schools for 2025

In the bustling real estate market of Washington, D.C., aspiring agents are seeking the best education to jumpstart their careers. With its mix of historic charm and modern vibrancy, the capital city offers a unique landscape for real estate professionals. But where does one begin? The answer lies in choosing the right real estate school.

Trump Administration’s Surprise Funding Freeze: Exploring Its Implications

The Trump administration issued a memo late Monday night ordering a temporary freeze on funding for a wide array of federal programs, sending shockwaves through federal agencies and various organizations reliant on government support.

By |October 29, 2025|Categories: Article, Government Policy, Politics|Tags: , |0 Comments

Navigating 2026: Opportunities in Commercial Real Estate Amid Challenges

Despite the ongoing macroeconomic volatility and policy uncertainty that have clouded the global economic outlook, there are avenues for growth for those who can adeptly navigate these complexities.

Finding the Best Real Estate Schools in North Carolina for 2025

In North Carolina, where real estate agents are known as brokers, requires a rigorous 75-hour prelicensing education. This can be pursued online or in person through state-approved schools.

By |October 28, 2025|Categories: Article, Education, Real Estate|Tags: |0 Comments

What to Do If You Fail Your Series 63 Exam: Options and Next Steps

The Series 63 exam can be retaken an unlimited number of times, provided you adhere to the waiting periods set by the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA). After an initial failure, a 30-day waiting period is required before you can retake the exam. If you fail a second time, another 30-day wait is necessary. Upon failing three times or more, a longer waiting period of 180 days is enforced.

By |October 27, 2025|Categories: Article, Education, Finance|Tags: , |0 Comments

Fifth Circuit Dismisses CFPB’s Appeal: A Strategic Shift in Regulatory Focus

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has dismissed the appeal by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) regarding the vacated amendments to its Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts and Practices (UDAAP) Examination Manual. This decision, made on May 1, aligns with the CFPB’s newly outlined supervision and enforcement priorities for 2025, marking a pivotal shift in the Bureau's regulatory approach.