The State Bar of California has recently come under fire after disclosing that artificial intelligence was used to develop some of the multiple-choice questions in their February bar exam. The revelation has stirred up a storm of controversy, particularly because this exam session was already marred by technological failures.
According to a report by MyMotherLode.com, the California bar exam, held in February 2025, faced significant issues. Many test-takers experienced severe disruptions, including platform crashes and error messages. These issues prevented some candidates from completing their exams, while others struggled to save their work or even start the test.
In a statement, Mary Basick, assistant dean of academic skills at the University of California, Irvine, Law School, expressed her disbelief, saying, “The debacle that was the February 2025 bar exam is worse than we imagined.” She added, “I’m almost speechless. Having the questions drafted by non-lawyers using artificial intelligence is just unbelievable.”
The State Bar of California has acknowledged that out of the 171 scored multiple-choice questions, 23 were developed using AI by ACS Ventures, their psychometrician. Despite the backlash, Leah Wilson, the executive director of the State Bar, defended the use of AI, stating, “We have confidence in the validity of the questions to accurately and fairly assess the legal competence of test-takers.”
However, not everyone is convinced. Katie Moran, an associate professor at the University of San Francisco School of Law, called the admission “a staggering revelation.” She criticized the State Bar for employing a company to have a non-lawyer use AI to draft questions and then assess them.
Andrew Perlman, dean of Suffolk University Law School, and a member of the American Bar Association Task Force on the Law and Artificial Intelligence, remarked that while the use of AI in developing exam questions isn’t surprising, it is crucial that any AI-generated content is thoroughly vetted by experts.
As AI technology continues to advance, Perlman predicts its increased use in various fields, including legal assessments. He foresees a future where the competence of lawyers who don’t use these tools might be questioned.
This incident highlights the growing intersection of technology and professional exams, raising important questions about the role of AI in high-stakes testing environments.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
In a landmark decision, the court has preliminarily approved settlement agreements in the commission lawsuits involving real estate companies RE/MAX and Anywhere Real Estate. The agreements require RE/MAX to pay $55 million and Anywhere Real Estate to pay $83.5 million. As part of the settlements, both companies will implement significant policy and practice changes, including the elimination of the requirement for agents to be members of the National Association of Realtors. This change will provide agents with more flexibility and independence in their business practices. The settlements have far-reaching implications for the real estate industry, fostering a more dynamic and customer-centric real estate market.
The housing market saw a remarkable increase in housing starts and permits in October, pointing to a positive industry trend. This surge suggests a growing demand among Americans for homeownership, prompting builders to respond by ramping up their construction efforts. However, builder confidence has been somewhat dampened by elevated mortgage rates. The housing market's performance varied across different regions in the United States, highlighting the diverse nature of the housing market and the various factors influencing construction trends.
CUSO Home Lending has implemented Dark Matter Technologies' advanced Empower loan origination system, revolutionizing the credit union lending process. The Empower system streamlines loan applications, automates document collection and verification, and facilitates seamless communication between borrowers, loan officers, and underwriters. With robust security measures and full compliance with industry regulations, the system ensures the protection of sensitive information. This move highlights the importance of embracing digital transformation in the lending industry.
United Wholesale Mortgage (UWM), a leading wholesale lender in the mortgage industry, has launched a new initiative offering no-cost appraisals on 1-0 temporary rate buydowns. This strategic move aims to attract more brokers by covering up to $600 of the appraisal cost on all conventional and government-backed home loans. Temporary rate buydowns allow borrowers to pay a lower mortgage rate during the initial period of their loans, making homeownership more affordable. This limited-time opportunity until March 31 provides brokers with a unique value proposition for their clients. Ready to explore the benefits of UWM's temporary rate buydowns and no-cost appraisals? Connect with UWM today.
Mark Willis has made a significant leadership change by returning as the CEO of Keller Williams, a leading player in the real estate industry. This news marks a triumphant comeback for Willis, who previously served as the CEO of Keller Williams from 2005 to 2014. Armed with extensive experience and a proven track record, Willis aims to steer Keller Williams towards continued success and navigate the challenges facing the real estate industry. This article will delve into Willis' career history, the growth of Keller Williams under his leadership, and the current landscape of the real estate market.
A recent lawsuit in Texas has sent shockwaves through the real estate industry, shedding light on alleged collusion among individual brokers, real estate teams, and large corporate brokerages. The lawsuit, filed by the QJ Team and other plaintiffs, accuses these entities of artificially inflating real estate agent commissions. The real estate industry has been rocked by a series of commission lawsuits in recent years, but the QJ Team lawsuit stands out due to its comprehensive list of defendants. The QJ Team lawsuit alleges that the defendants engaged in collusion to artificially inflate real estate agent commissions, thereby restricting competition and harming consumers. The plaintiffs claim that these entities conspired to set and maintain high commission rates, limiting the ability of homebuyers and sellers to negotiate fair prices. If proven true, these allegations could have far-reaching consequences for the real estate industry in Texas.
