Flood Disclosures Take Center Stage as Massachusetts Faces a Wetter Future
For 35 years, Denise Kress has woken up to the natural beauty of Belle Isle Marsh just beyond her Winthrop backyard. But the marsh, once a peaceful view, has increasingly become an unpredictable force of nature — one capable of swallowing cars, flooding basements, and turning daily life into a never‑ending battle with water.
Kress has endured totaled vehicles, ruined heating systems, and even hotel stays after her basement froze over in 2018. Yet, she remains — comforted by the same marsh that challenges her. Still, she wonders what will happen the day she eventually sells her home.
“I would want the next owner to know,” she says. “People have a right to know.”
A Push for Flood Transparency
As climate conditions worsen, Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey is pushing a proposal that could reshape property transactions statewide: mandatory flood disclosures. With Massachusetts being one of only 14 states — and just three on the coast — with no disclosure requirements, the goal is simple: ensure buyers understand the risks before signing on the dotted line.
The proposal is part of Healey’s nearly $3 billion environmental bond bill aimed at updating dams, stormwater systems, and coastal defenses. But for real estate professionals, the disclosure requirement is the real game‑changer.
Why Flood Disclosures Matter
Flood histories directly affect insurance rates, property values, and long‑term financial stability. Without disclosures, buyers may unknowingly take on high‑risk properties. Transparency protects consumers while creating a fairer marketplace.
A Divided Real Estate Landscape
Support for the proposal comes from the business community, insurance experts, and municipalities. But one major player remains hesitant: the real estate industry.
The Massachusetts Association of Realtors argues that the rule disrupts the traditional “buyer beware” structure, shifting more responsibility onto sellers. Others believe the focus should be on increasing housing availability before adding major regulatory changes.
Still, economists — including Redfin’s chief economist — say disclosures create a more stable and trustworthy housing market.
Real Lives, Real Consequences
The debate isn’t theoretical. Former Salem homeowner Carole McCauley faced the issue firsthand after a 2011 storm flooded her basement with three feet of water, destroying her sump pumps, water heater, and car. When selling her home later, she did not disclose the flood history.
“I felt like a real jerk,” she admits — an all‑too‑common dilemma when laws don’t require transparency.
A Costly Lesson in a Changing Climate
McCauley says the experience reshaped her understanding of climate change, finances, and personal responsibility. “This isn’t just about science,” she says. “It’s about people’s retirement, their savings… their lives.”
The Road Ahead
Healey’s proposal now enters the legislative arena next year, raising major questions about transparency, safety, and the future of homeownership in a rapidly changing climate.
As one flood expert describes it, avoiding flood disclosure is like playing “a perverse game of musical chairs.” Eventually, someone gets stuck with a home that floods too often to sustain.
What This Means for Real Estate Professionals
Mandatory flood disclosures could reshape Massachusetts’ real estate environment. For anyone pursuing or maintaining their real estate license, understanding these shifts is essential.
At Cameron Academy, we emphasize ethical representation, consumer protection, and staying ahead of industry‑wide changes. For new and seasoned professionals alike, knowledge of flood disclosure laws helps build trust and elevate your practice.
To explore the original reporting behind this story, visit Commonwealth Beacon:
commonwealthbeacon.org
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Four of the largest Multiple Listing Services (MLSs) in the Southeast have recently formed an alliance, establishing a data sharing network aimed at increasing referral business among real estate agents. The Charleston Regional MLS in South Carolina, Canopy MLS in North Carolina, Georgia MLS, and Realtracs, the largest MLS in Alabama, Kentucky, and Tennessee, have come together to create the Southeast MLS Alliance. This strategic partnership will enable members of these four MLSs to access over 85,000 listings across Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, Tennessee, and South Carolina, providing real estate agents with valuable data and expanding their referral opportunities throughout the Southeast.
The current state of the mortgage market has presented prospective homebuyers with a significant challenge – surging mortgage rates. These rates have reached a 20-year high, hovering around 7.7%, making it increasingly difficult for borrowers to secure affordable loans. As a result, borrowers are actively seeking support from their family members to overcome this hurdle. To combat the impact of surging mortgage rates, borrowers are turning to their parents for financial assistance. This can take the form of gifted funds or by having parents become non-occupant co-borrowers. By involving family members in the mortgage process, borrowers can increase their chances of securing loans and achieving their homeownership goals.
In a surprising turn of events, Inga Dow, a prominent Keller Williams franchisee and CEO of multiple Texas-based Keller Williams offices, has withdrawn her sexual misconduct lawsuit against the real estate giant. While Dow's claims against Keller Williams and its co-founder, Gary Keller, have been dropped, the lawsuit against former CEO John Davis remains ongoing. The outcome of this legal battle is still uncertain, and further details may emerge as the case progresses. Stay informed with Cameron Academy's online courses tailored to your needs and goals in the real estate industry.
The recent approval of Remote Online Notarization (RON) legislation in California is a significant development that Cameron Academy is thrilled to discuss. This progressive bill, signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom, enables individuals to notarize their documents remotely using advanced audiovisual technology. The introduction of RON legislation in California brings about numerous advantages that revolutionize the notarization process. By embracing digital advancements, California is empowering individuals and businesses with enhanced convenience and accessibility, significant time and cost savings, improved security, and streamlined workflow.
"Even though mortgage origination volumes are down, we’re experiencing a highly competitive purchase market. That means a number of businesses, seeking to grow their revenue, will likely look to expand their reach to the default and REO space. However, venturing into this industry without proper knowledge and preparation can lead to serious consequences. By understanding the lessons learned from the past foreclosure wave and staying current with the changing environment, businesses can navigate the challenges and seize the opportunities presented by the default and REO market."
In the ongoing legal battle involving the National Association of Realtors (NAR), Keller Williams, and HomeServices of America, a recent development has emerged. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit, known as the Sitzer/Burnett plaintiffs, have filed a notice to withdraw three named plaintiffs. This move is seen by the defendants as an attempt to avoid cross-examination. The lawsuit, initially filed in April 2019, challenges NAR's Participation Rule, which requires listing agents to offer compensation to buyers' agents in order to list a property on a Realtor-affiliated multiple listing service (MLS). The plaintiffs argue that this commission sharing inflates costs for consumers, in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. With the trial scheduled to start on October 16, the potential damages in this suit are estimated to be up to $4 billion.
