Future of Telehealth Uncertain As Congress Deliberates Budget
As the clock ticks down to December 31, 2024, the future of telehealth services in the United States hangs in the balance. The looming deadline has healthcare providers, hospitals, and stakeholders on high alert. At the heart of this uncertainty is the need for Congress to extend key policy flexibilities that have supported telehealth and Hospital-at-Home programs for Medicare patients since the COVID-19 pandemic. Without these extensions, Medicare coverage for many telehealth services could cease on January 1, 2025, potentially disrupting healthcare access for countless Americans, especially seniors.
The Legislative Tug of War
Despite bipartisan support for telehealth, recent attempts to pass a Continuing Resolution (CR) have met with obstacles. A proposed CR that included a two-year extension for telehealth flexibilities was rejected on December 18, 2024, due to unrelated controversies. However, a newer proposal, the American Relief Act, 2025, introduced on December 19, 2024, offers a glimmer of hope. This act seeks to extend telehealth flexibilities and the Acute Hospital Care at Home program through March 31, 2025, albeit without addressing other significant healthcare provisions.
Advocacy and Impact
The uncertainty surrounding telehealth policy has mobilized advocacy groups like the American Telemedicine Association’s ATA Action group, who are urging Congress and the White House to act swiftly. The stakes are high: without action, clinicians and practices face the daunting task of reorganizing their operations to comply with more restrictive Medicare policies come January 1, 2025.
The potential expiration of these policies could significantly impact Medicare services, limiting the types of telehealth services clinicians can provide. While some mental healthcare services may continue under existing Medicare policies, the more restrictive geographic requirements could hinder access for many patients. Notably, clinicians at federally qualified health centers or rural health clinics will remain unaffected due to coverage under the 2025 Physician Fee Schedule.
The Broader Repercussions
Beyond Medicare, the failure to extend telehealth flexibilities could ripple through other reimbursement policies. Private insurers and Medicaid programs might eventually adjust their policies to align with Medicare, potentially affecting hospitals, clinicians, and patients nationwide. The advocacy efforts underscore the critical need for Congress to address these concerns promptly.
DEA Prescribing Rules Remain Unchanged
Amidst the budgetary deliberations, it’s important to note that the DEA’s decision regarding controlled substance prescribing in telehealth remains unaffected. The DEA has extended these flexibilities through December 31, 2025, ensuring continuity in this aspect of telehealth services.
Conclusion
The outcome of these legislative efforts will have profound implications for the future of telehealth in the United States. As the deadline approaches, the healthcare community continues to advocate for the inclusion of telehealth provisions in any budget resolution. For more information, resources such as the Alliance for Connected Care and the American Telemedicine Association offer valuable guidance.
Stay Updated
For live updates on congressional efforts, follow the Associated Press.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Florida’s insurance market is under intense pressure as millions of residents and trillions in property wealth cluster along hurricane‑vulnerable coastlines. This article breaks down how decades of growth in high‑risk zones created today’s crisis, why traditional pricing models can’t keep up, and what real estate and insurance professionals must do to stay ahead. It offers actionable insights on underwriting, risk communication, policy partnerships, and resilience planning—critical knowledge for anyone advising Florida homeowners or navigating the state’s evolving insurance landscape.
Florida’s homeowners insurance market may have stabilized, but not in the way residents hoped. After years of runaway increases, premiums have stopped spiking—but they’re holding at painfully high levels. Coastal properties remain the hardest hit, with some policies topping $15,000 a year, while insurers continue demanding costly upgrades and resisting calls for transparency. For real estate professionals, understanding these pricing pressures is becoming essential as insurance costs increasingly shape buyer decisions across the state.
Florida homeowners face soaring premiums, shrinking insurer options, and storms that grow stronger each year. This article breaks down what hurricane insurance actually covers, how deductibles really work, why flood insurance is essential, and what professionals in real estate, mortgage, and insurance must understand to protect clients and properties before the next major storm hits.
Teresa King Kinney, one of the most influential executives in modern real estate, is retiring after 33 years as CEO of the MIAMI Association of Realtors. Under her leadership, the organization grew from 5,000 members to 60,000, became a global real estate powerhouse, and built the nation’s largest association‑owned MLS. As she transitions into CEO Emeritus, MIAMI prepares for a new era shaped by the foundation she spent decades building.
Miami’s commercial property market is heating up again, posting an 11% jump in investment volume for 2025. The surge is driven largely by a revitalized retail sector fueled by population growth, strong tourism, and new mixed‑use development. While office and industrial activity remains steady but softer, investor confidence is returning as Miami’s CRE landscape matures and buyers re‑enter the market with renewed interest in high‑traffic retail opportunities.
The Federal Reserve is preparing major changes to mortgage regulations in an effort to pull more mortgage activity back into the banking sector. With banks losing significant market share to nonbank lenders over the past decade, Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman says new proposals may ease capital requirements and make mortgage servicing more attractive for banks. These shifts could have wide‑ranging effects on real estate professionals, lenders, and borrowers as the balance of power in the mortgage market begins to shift once again.
