Future of Telehealth Uncertain As Congress Deliberates Budget
As the clock ticks down to December 31, 2024, the future of telehealth services in the United States hangs in the balance. The looming deadline has healthcare providers, hospitals, and stakeholders on high alert. At the heart of this uncertainty is the need for Congress to extend key policy flexibilities that have supported telehealth and Hospital-at-Home programs for Medicare patients since the COVID-19 pandemic. Without these extensions, Medicare coverage for many telehealth services could cease on January 1, 2025, potentially disrupting healthcare access for countless Americans, especially seniors.
The Legislative Tug of War
Despite bipartisan support for telehealth, recent attempts to pass a Continuing Resolution (CR) have met with obstacles. A proposed CR that included a two-year extension for telehealth flexibilities was rejected on December 18, 2024, due to unrelated controversies. However, a newer proposal, the American Relief Act, 2025, introduced on December 19, 2024, offers a glimmer of hope. This act seeks to extend telehealth flexibilities and the Acute Hospital Care at Home program through March 31, 2025, albeit without addressing other significant healthcare provisions.
Advocacy and Impact
The uncertainty surrounding telehealth policy has mobilized advocacy groups like the American Telemedicine Association’s ATA Action group, who are urging Congress and the White House to act swiftly. The stakes are high: without action, clinicians and practices face the daunting task of reorganizing their operations to comply with more restrictive Medicare policies come January 1, 2025.
The potential expiration of these policies could significantly impact Medicare services, limiting the types of telehealth services clinicians can provide. While some mental healthcare services may continue under existing Medicare policies, the more restrictive geographic requirements could hinder access for many patients. Notably, clinicians at federally qualified health centers or rural health clinics will remain unaffected due to coverage under the 2025 Physician Fee Schedule.
The Broader Repercussions
Beyond Medicare, the failure to extend telehealth flexibilities could ripple through other reimbursement policies. Private insurers and Medicaid programs might eventually adjust their policies to align with Medicare, potentially affecting hospitals, clinicians, and patients nationwide. The advocacy efforts underscore the critical need for Congress to address these concerns promptly.
DEA Prescribing Rules Remain Unchanged
Amidst the budgetary deliberations, it’s important to note that the DEA’s decision regarding controlled substance prescribing in telehealth remains unaffected. The DEA has extended these flexibilities through December 31, 2025, ensuring continuity in this aspect of telehealth services.
Conclusion
The outcome of these legislative efforts will have profound implications for the future of telehealth in the United States. As the deadline approaches, the healthcare community continues to advocate for the inclusion of telehealth provisions in any budget resolution. For more information, resources such as the Alliance for Connected Care and the American Telemedicine Association offer valuable guidance.
Stay Updated
For live updates on congressional efforts, follow the Associated Press.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
In the competitive world of real estate, RE/MAX recently settled a commission lawsuit for a substantial $55 million. This strategic decision has sparked intrigue and raised questions about the company's future. The lawsuit, initiated by a group of real estate agents, accused RE/MAX of commission fraud and unfair practices. However, RE/MAX chose to settle the lawsuit, demonstrating its commitment to swiftly resolving legal matters and maintaining a positive trajectory. Despite the financial implications, RE/MAX remains financially robust and poised for future growth. The company's commitment to transparency, fairness, and ethical business practices remains steadfast. As the dust settles on the commission lawsuit settlement, RE/MAX looks to the future with unwavering confidence.
¿Interesado en obtener una licencia de bienes raíces? Nuestra versión en español del curso de pre-licencia de bienes raíces de 63 horas está diseñada para personas que prefieren aprender en español. Nuestro currículo integral cubre temas esenciales desde principios de bienes raíces hasta la ley de contratos y ética. Con la flexibilidad del aprendizaje en línea, puedes adaptar tu educación inmobiliaria a tu apretada agenda. Inscríbete hoy y da el primer paso para convertirte en un profesional inmobiliario con licencia. ¡Inicia tu viaje en el mundo de los bienes raíces hoy mismo!
The real estate industry is abuzz with Bob Goldberg stepping down as the CEO of the National Association of Realtors (NAR). This leadership change comes after the Sitzer/Burnett commission lawsuit trial, raising questions about NAR's practices. Goldberg's departure marks a significant moment in NAR's history, presenting an opportunity for reevaluation and rebuilding. As the industry evolves, NAR must adapt and embrace change to remain relevant. At Cameron Academy, we provide high-quality career education courses for a competitive advantage in the real estate industry. Start your journey towards success today! Explore Our Courses: https://cameronacademy.com/our-courses-cameron-academy
Commission lawsuits in the real estate sector are becoming increasingly prevalent, causing industry professionals to worry. Glenn Sanford, eXp World Holdings' CEO, recently voiced his fears about the potential repercussions of these lawsuits on low-income buyers. Sanford's primary worry centers around affordable housing access for low-income buyers. With the rise of commission lawsuits, Sanford is apprehensive that the legal costs will ultimately be shouldered by the buyers. This could further complicate the process for low-income individuals striving to enter the housing market and achieve homeownership. The Sitzer/Burnett verdict, which found real estate agents guilty of antitrust violations by conspiring to fix buyer broker commissions, has brought the issue of commission lawsuits to the forefront. The far-reaching implications of this verdict have ignited debates about the future of buyer broker commissions.
The ongoing Sitzer/Burnett commission lawsuit trial has captured the attention of the real estate industry, as it holds the potential to reshape the way agent commissions are structured. In this article, we explore the viewpoints of brokers, agents, and real estate economists, who provide valuable insights into the possible outcomes of the trial and its implications for the industry. By examining their perspectives, we aim to shed light on the debate surrounding real estate agent commissions and the potential impact of this landmark trial.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has recently implemented a new rule that mandates nonbank financial institutions to report data breaches and other security events. This rule aims to enhance transparency and ensure the safety of customers' information. Nonbank financial institutions, including mortgage brokers, payday lenders, and virtual currency exchanges, must promptly report data breaches if they affect at least 500 customers and involve unauthorized access to unencrypted information. The FTC's new rule requiring nonbank financial institutions to report data breaches is a significant step towards ensuring transparency, accountability, and customer safety.
