Future of Telehealth Uncertain As Congress Deliberates Budget
As the clock ticks down to December 31, 2024, the future of telehealth services in the United States hangs in the balance. The looming deadline has healthcare providers, hospitals, and stakeholders on high alert. At the heart of this uncertainty is the need for Congress to extend key policy flexibilities that have supported telehealth and Hospital-at-Home programs for Medicare patients since the COVID-19 pandemic. Without these extensions, Medicare coverage for many telehealth services could cease on January 1, 2025, potentially disrupting healthcare access for countless Americans, especially seniors.
The Legislative Tug of War
Despite bipartisan support for telehealth, recent attempts to pass a Continuing Resolution (CR) have met with obstacles. A proposed CR that included a two-year extension for telehealth flexibilities was rejected on December 18, 2024, due to unrelated controversies. However, a newer proposal, the American Relief Act, 2025, introduced on December 19, 2024, offers a glimmer of hope. This act seeks to extend telehealth flexibilities and the Acute Hospital Care at Home program through March 31, 2025, albeit without addressing other significant healthcare provisions.
Advocacy and Impact
The uncertainty surrounding telehealth policy has mobilized advocacy groups like the American Telemedicine Association’s ATA Action group, who are urging Congress and the White House to act swiftly. The stakes are high: without action, clinicians and practices face the daunting task of reorganizing their operations to comply with more restrictive Medicare policies come January 1, 2025.
The potential expiration of these policies could significantly impact Medicare services, limiting the types of telehealth services clinicians can provide. While some mental healthcare services may continue under existing Medicare policies, the more restrictive geographic requirements could hinder access for many patients. Notably, clinicians at federally qualified health centers or rural health clinics will remain unaffected due to coverage under the 2025 Physician Fee Schedule.
The Broader Repercussions
Beyond Medicare, the failure to extend telehealth flexibilities could ripple through other reimbursement policies. Private insurers and Medicaid programs might eventually adjust their policies to align with Medicare, potentially affecting hospitals, clinicians, and patients nationwide. The advocacy efforts underscore the critical need for Congress to address these concerns promptly.
DEA Prescribing Rules Remain Unchanged
Amidst the budgetary deliberations, it’s important to note that the DEA’s decision regarding controlled substance prescribing in telehealth remains unaffected. The DEA has extended these flexibilities through December 31, 2025, ensuring continuity in this aspect of telehealth services.
Conclusion
The outcome of these legislative efforts will have profound implications for the future of telehealth in the United States. As the deadline approaches, the healthcare community continues to advocate for the inclusion of telehealth provisions in any budget resolution. For more information, resources such as the Alliance for Connected Care and the American Telemedicine Association offer valuable guidance.
Stay Updated
For live updates on congressional efforts, follow the Associated Press.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Just 48 hours after NAR unveiled major revisions to its MLS policies, plaintiffs in the Michigan-based Hardy lawsuit moved to use those changes as evidence, arguing they prove NAR’s prior rules were anticompetitive. NAR denies any wrongdoing, but the case is quickly becoming a key test for whether MLS access should require Realtor membership — a question now echoing across multiple states and potentially reshaping how real estate professionals nationwide access the industry’s most essential tool.
Florida homeowners are now paying some of the highest insurance premiums in the country, with average costs topping $5,800 per year—nearly double the national average. Residents report skyrocketing rates, denied claims, and tough choices between costly coverage and financial risk. As frustration grows, lawmakers and consumer advocates are pushing new reforms aimed at increasing transparency, capping rate hikes, and protecting policyholders in one of the nation’s most volatile insurance markets.
Economic uncertainty, rapid AI adoption, tighter capital flows, and rising portfolio risk are reshaping the 2026 commercial real estate landscape. From shifting workforce patterns to a national housing attainability crisis, the industry is entering a data‑driven, fundamentals‑focused era—making adaptability, education, and tech literacy essential for real estate professionals.
Mortgage rates have climbed to 6.23 percent as investors grow doubtful that the Federal Reserve will deliver a rate cut in December. A soft but unclear jobs report and persistent inflation have pushed borrowing costs higher, reversing October’s brief relief in the housing market. Real estate and mortgage professionals should prepare clients for continued volatility as the Fed’s December meeting approaches.
After years of tight inventory, high mortgage rates, and sluggish sales, economists say 2026 is shaping up to be the turnaround real estate professionals have been waiting for. NAR projects a 14 percent jump in home sales, mortgage rates easing toward 6 percent, and buyer demand finally gaining momentum. While higher‑end homes are moving quickly, first‑time buyers continue to face affordability challenges, and price reductions are reappearing as sellers adjust to shifting conditions. For Florida agents, brokers, and newcomers, the stage is being set for a busy and opportunity‑rich year.
Florida’s average homeowner insurance premium has soared to $5,838 a year—almost $3,000 above the national average—pushing many residents to the financial brink. From tripled premiums to lowball claim payouts, homeowners are speaking out as frustration mounts. Some are even dropping coverage entirely. With more than 40% of claims closed without payment and policy cancellations at record levels, lawmakers are pushing for reforms, but political hurdles remain. The outcome could reshape Florida real estate, insurance, and mortgage markets for years to come.
