In the heated arena of the U.S. presidential race, Vice President Kamala Harris has been making waves with her pointed critiques of former President Donald Trump’s business history. During a rally in Charlotte, North Carolina, on September 12, Harris unveiled her proposal for a $50,000 tax deduction aimed at small business startups. She then took a direct jab at Trump, asserting, “You know, not everybody started out with $400m on a silver platter and then filed for bankruptcy six times.”
Harris’s remarks have sparked a flurry of fact-checking, with many turning to a recent article from Al Jazeera that delves into the veracity of these claims. The article references a comprehensive 2018 analysis by The New York Times, revealing that Trump did indeed receive approximately $413 million from his father, Fred Trump, over his lifetime. However, this sum was not a single lump sum at the start of his career but rather dispersed over many years.
During a recent debate, Trump countered Harris’s claims, stating, “I wasn’t given $400m. I wish I was. My father was a Brooklyn builder. Brooklyn, Queens. And a great father, and I learned a lot from him. But I was given a fraction of that, a tiny fraction, and I built it into many, many billions of dollars.” The debate further intensified when Harris reiterated her points in a conversation hosted by Oprah Winfrey.
The Al Jazeera article also examines the claim of Trump’s six bankruptcies, confirming its accuracy. Trump’s financial struggles included high-profile bankruptcies such as the Trump Taj Mahal casino in 1991 and Trump Entertainment Resorts in 2009, among others. Experts have noted that while Trump did experience these financial setbacks, they are not uncommon in the business world.
Our Ruling
While Harris’s statement about Trump’s business beginnings contains elements of truth, it omits significant details. The New York Times investigation clarifies that Trump did not start his business career with $400 million readily available. Instead, he had the prospect of inheriting a portion of his father’s substantial real estate empire. This nuanced reality leads us to rate Harris’s statement as Half True.
Conclusion
As the presidential race progresses, the scrutiny of candidates’ claims remains crucial. Harris’s comments highlight the ongoing debate about wealth and privilege in America, while Trump’s rebuttal underscores the complexities of his business legacy. The full story, as always, is layered and multifaceted.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
A growing share of American homeowners now carry mortgage rates above 5%—a dramatic shift that’s reshaping refinancing, inventory, and buyer behavior nationwide. With more than 30% of borrowers locked into rates over 5% and 20% above 6%, the market is split between owners holding on to low pandemic‑era loans and new buyers taking on higher‑rate mortgages. Federal efforts to push rates down could unlock millions of refinancing opportunities, while buyers see only modest monthly savings. For real estate professionals, understanding these rate dynamics is crucial as they increasingly drive inventory levels, affordability, and market activity.
New Moody’s data shows commercial real estate deal volume slipped 20% in December, marking a second monthly decline. Yet the full year tells a different story: 2025 ended with a 17% gain, signaling a quiet but resilient recovery. The biggest surprise came from the office sector, which posted a 21% jump in activity as return‑to‑office trends and AI‑driven job growth boosted demand. Multifamily, retail, and alternative assets like data centers also saw strong momentum, giving real estate professionals a market full of fresh opportunities heading into 2026.
Florida drivers and industry professionals are heading into 2026 with good news: auto insurance rates are dropping across the state as the market shows strong signs of stabilization. USAA leads the latest wave with a 7% average rate decrease expected in May 2026, saving members more than $125 million annually. They join several major insurers — including State Farm, Progressive, AAA, Allstate, and Florida Farm Bureau — all approving significant reductions. Officials credit recent legislative reforms, especially tort reform, for the improved loss ratios and renewed insurer confidence. With both auto and home insurance markets strengthening, Florida’s real estate, mortgage, and insurance professionals can expect more consumer confidence, smoother transactions, and expanding career opportunities.
New data from Eye On Housing and the NAHB shows the U.S. remains short more than 1.2 million housing units, keeping pressure on both rents and home prices. Record‑low vacancy rates, slow single‑family construction, and restrictive zoning continue to fuel intense competition in 2024. Major metros like Chicago, New York, and Atlanta face some of the deepest deficits, and the true nationwide shortfall may be even higher when accounting for overcrowding and aging homes. For real estate professionals, the ongoing shortage means sustained demand, tighter inventory, and major opportunities for those who understand the evolving market.
Top real estate coach Jason Pantana says the divide between agents today isn’t about who has “tried” AI — it’s about who is immersed in it. In a new HousingWire interview, he explains why AI isn’t a gimmick but a full business system that amplifies output, improves authenticity, and reshapes how clients search for agents. From prompt mastery to AI‑driven visibility on Google, Pantana reveals how agents who commit even 15 minutes a day to learning AI are already outperforming those who hesitate.
Dallas–Fort Worth’s commercial real estate market closed 2025 with a split personality. Industrial dominated with massive new deliveries and soaring leasing demand, retail held steady with some of the market’s strongest fundamentals in years, and office continued to falter under remote‑work pressures. High vacancies, weak absorption, and rising demand for top‑tier space show the sector’s ongoing reset. Meanwhile, industrial and retail strength position the Metroplex for another powerhouse year heading into 2026.
