In the heated arena of the U.S. presidential race, Vice President Kamala Harris has been making waves with her pointed critiques of former President Donald Trump’s business history. During a rally in Charlotte, North Carolina, on September 12, Harris unveiled her proposal for a $50,000 tax deduction aimed at small business startups. She then took a direct jab at Trump, asserting, “You know, not everybody started out with $400m on a silver platter and then filed for bankruptcy six times.”
Harris’s remarks have sparked a flurry of fact-checking, with many turning to a recent article from Al Jazeera that delves into the veracity of these claims. The article references a comprehensive 2018 analysis by The New York Times, revealing that Trump did indeed receive approximately $413 million from his father, Fred Trump, over his lifetime. However, this sum was not a single lump sum at the start of his career but rather dispersed over many years.
During a recent debate, Trump countered Harris’s claims, stating, “I wasn’t given $400m. I wish I was. My father was a Brooklyn builder. Brooklyn, Queens. And a great father, and I learned a lot from him. But I was given a fraction of that, a tiny fraction, and I built it into many, many billions of dollars.” The debate further intensified when Harris reiterated her points in a conversation hosted by Oprah Winfrey.
The Al Jazeera article also examines the claim of Trump’s six bankruptcies, confirming its accuracy. Trump’s financial struggles included high-profile bankruptcies such as the Trump Taj Mahal casino in 1991 and Trump Entertainment Resorts in 2009, among others. Experts have noted that while Trump did experience these financial setbacks, they are not uncommon in the business world.
Our Ruling
While Harris’s statement about Trump’s business beginnings contains elements of truth, it omits significant details. The New York Times investigation clarifies that Trump did not start his business career with $400 million readily available. Instead, he had the prospect of inheriting a portion of his father’s substantial real estate empire. This nuanced reality leads us to rate Harris’s statement as Half True.
Conclusion
As the presidential race progresses, the scrutiny of candidates’ claims remains crucial. Harris’s comments highlight the ongoing debate about wealth and privilege in America, while Trump’s rebuttal underscores the complexities of his business legacy. The full story, as always, is layered and multifaceted.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Commercial real estate is entering a decade of major transformation driven by interest rate pressures, evolving work culture, rapid proptech innovation, and growing demand for AI-focused infrastructure. While the global CRE market is projected to reach $133.5 trillion by 2028, rising rates, shifting office demand, and increasing sustainability requirements are reshaping how professionals invest, manage, and develop properties. By 2030, the biggest opportunities will center on mixed‑use conversions, data center growth, premium office spaces, and ESG‑driven upgrades.
The National Association of Realtors’ landmark antitrust settlement is transforming how real estate agents negotiate compensation, work with buyers, and handle transparency in transactions. With MLS‑posted buyer‑broker commissions eliminated and written buyer agreements now required, both consumers and professionals are navigating a new, more transparent landscape. While commission levels have only dipped slightly, the real shift is in how openly compensation is discussed and negotiated—creating new challenges and opportunities for agents who adapt quickly.
Artificial intelligence is no longer a novelty in real estate — 2025 marks its breakthrough year as a dependable pillar of the proptech industry. With investors pouring capital into AI‑powered forecasting, security, automation, and property management tools, the sector is shifting from experimentation to full‑scale adoption. Brokerages, developers, and institutional players now rely on AI to streamline due diligence, enhance market modeling, reduce risk, and optimize building operations. As adoption accelerates, professionals who understand and leverage these technologies are gaining a decisive competitive edge in fast‑moving markets like Florida.
A new episode of Current Account breaks down why the insurance industry is heading into 2026 with more uncertainty — and more opportunity — than ever. From shifting global regulations and rising catastrophe risks to FSOC’s evolving role in the U.S., industry leaders Jérôme Haegeli and Philippe Brahin explain how insurers are being pushed to rethink strategy in real time. With global premium growth expected to slow and regulatory pressures rising, professionals in insurance and financial services are turning to education and new skills to stay ahead in a rapidly changing market.
New Jersey is quietly becoming one of the hottest commercial real estate markets in the nation, with Jersey City and North Jersey breaking into the top 10 in PwC’s 2026 Emerging Trends report. Fueled by redevelopment momentum, data‑center demand, mixed‑use transformations and a surge in health‑care projects, the state is drawing major investors while still battling rising construction costs and municipal fatigue. For real estate professionals, the Garden State’s evolution signals fresh opportunity—and a market worth watching closely heading into 2026.
The National Council of Insurance Legislators is pushing back against President Trump’s new executive order on artificial intelligence, arguing that it threatens decades of state‑based insurance oversight. NCOIL leaders say federal attempts to centralize AI authority could disrupt markets, weaken consumer protections, and limit states’ ability to innovate—setting the stage for a significant legal and political battle with major implications for insurance professionals who rely on AI‑driven tools and regulatory clarity.
