Rocket Mortgage Hit with Class Action After Ignoring Opt-Out Requests

Legal gavel on documents

Rocket Mortgage is facing fresh legal trouble as a new lawsuit accuses the lender of continuing telemarketing outreach even after confirming that a consumer had successfully opted out. Filed November 12 in federal court in Florida, the complaint alleges violations of both federal and state telemarketing laws—and marks the 56th TCPA-related case brought against the company.

Key Claim: Rocket allegedly called a consumer twelve times after confirming she had been removed from future communications.

The Consumer’s Experience

Hillary Wissart of Kissimmee, Florida, says she visited RocketMortgage.com on October 9 to check mortgage rates. Just hours later, she received a voicemail from a representative identifying himself as Miguel Rodriguez, followed by a text message welcoming her to her “home financing journey” and offering an opt‑out option by replying “STOP.”

Wissart sent the STOP request immediately. Rocket responded with a confirmation: “You have successfully been unsubscribed. You will not receive any more messages from this number.”

But the calls allegedly continued.

Timeline of Events

  • Oct 9: Initial call and text from Rocket representative.
  • Oct 9 (3:51 PM): Wissart sends STOP request; receives confirmation.
  • Oct 10–29: Multiple calls from the same number, including Oct 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, and 29.
  • Oct 23: Second voicemail left by the representative.

Compliance Concerns

Federal telemarketing regulations require companies to honor do‑not‑call requests within ten business days. The lawsuit claims Rocket failed to maintain proper internal procedures for honoring consumer opt‑outs, as all calls and messages allegedly originated from the same number—indicating the STOP request likely never propagated through their system.

Wissart is not a Rocket customer and uses her phone strictly for personal communication. Her filing also notes that Rocket has been sued 55 prior times for alleged TCPA violations, raising continued questions about the company’s compliance infrastructure.

The Class Action Scope

Wissart seeks to represent two groups:

  • Nationwide consumers who sent an opt‑out text but received more than one subsequent call.
  • Florida residents who received any calls after opting out.

The complaint estimates that more than 10,000 people may qualify.

Potential Penalties

The case invokes both the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Florida’s Telephone Solicitation Act. These laws carry statutory penalties of $500 per unlawful call—and up to $1,500 if the violations are deemed willful.

Industry Takeaway

For mortgage lenders and other lead‑driven industries, the lawsuit highlights ongoing challenges with managing suppression lists and maintaining compliant outreach workflows across call, text, and digital channels. As marketing automation expands, clean data hygiene and synchronized opt‑out systems remain essential.

Rocket Mortgage has not yet filed a response, and no court has made any determination regarding the allegations.

More Articles

Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!

Real Estate Agents Embrace AI — But Confidence and Training Lag Behind

A new national survey shows that while most real estate agents now use AI for everyday tasks like writing listing descriptions and social posts, many remain uneasy trusting the technology with higher‑stakes responsibilities. Agents report major time savings and better communication thanks to AI, but lingering concerns about accuracy, compliance and data interpretation reveal a growing skills gap. The industry’s next big need: stronger AI tools, clearer standards and hands‑on training — a gap education providers like Cameron Academy are poised to fill.

Florida’s Property Insurance Crisis Is Spiraling—and Lawmakers Are Looking the Other Way

Florida homeowners and real estate professionals are being crushed by skyrocketing insurance premiums, shrinking coverage, and a claims system stacked against consumers. While residents face the highest insurance costs in the nation, meaningful reform bills are being ignored in Tallahassee, leaving families, businesses, and the entire real estate market exposed.

AI Forces Real Estate to Finally Fix Its Broken Data Systems

Artificial intelligence is exposing the real estate industry's biggest weakness: fragmented, inconsistent data scattered across disconnected systems. Unlike finance and e‑commerce, real estate never built a unified digital foundation—and now AI can’t function without one. As companies scramble to standardize information, organizations like OSCRE are pushing shared data models that could transform everything from leasing to property management. The result may be the industry’s most collaborative era yet, where clean, interoperable data becomes the key to unlocking AI’s full power.

Off‑Market Deals and Investor Demand Are Rewriting Residential Real Estate

Off‑market networks, rising small‑investor buying, regulatory shifts, and intensifying portal competition are reshaping how homes are found and sold. With inventory tight and traditional listings declining, agents who understand investor behavior, private deal flow, and evolving rules are gaining a major edge in today’s fast‑changing housing landscape.

Florida Homeowners Insurance Hits a “New Normal” as Costs Stay Painfully High

Despite state leaders celebrating stabilization, Florida homeowners continue to face some of the highest insurance premiums in the country. Local experts say rates have stopped skyrocketing but have settled at levels that feel permanently elevated—especially for older or coastal homes. With insurers still avoiding high‑risk areas and demanding costly home upgrades, many Floridians are questioning whether this expensive reality is here to stay.

New California Bill Would Require Insurers to Cover Homes Built to Wildfire‑Safety Standards

California is pushing a landmark proposal that would force insurers to offer coverage to homeowners who meet state‑approved wildfire‑mitigation standards. The new SB 1076, known as the Insurance Coverage for Fire‑Safe Homes Act, aims to stabilize the state’s distressed insurance market by guaranteeing coverage for fire‑hardened homes starting in 2028—backed by strict penalties for insurers who refuse. As supporters rally and critics warn of market strain, the bill could reshape real estate, insurance, and lending practices across wildfire‑prone regions.