Rocket Mortgage Hit with Class Action After Ignoring Opt-Out Requests

Legal gavel on documents

Rocket Mortgage is facing fresh legal trouble as a new lawsuit accuses the lender of continuing telemarketing outreach even after confirming that a consumer had successfully opted out. Filed November 12 in federal court in Florida, the complaint alleges violations of both federal and state telemarketing laws—and marks the 56th TCPA-related case brought against the company.

Key Claim: Rocket allegedly called a consumer twelve times after confirming she had been removed from future communications.

The Consumer’s Experience

Hillary Wissart of Kissimmee, Florida, says she visited RocketMortgage.com on October 9 to check mortgage rates. Just hours later, she received a voicemail from a representative identifying himself as Miguel Rodriguez, followed by a text message welcoming her to her “home financing journey” and offering an opt‑out option by replying “STOP.”

Wissart sent the STOP request immediately. Rocket responded with a confirmation: “You have successfully been unsubscribed. You will not receive any more messages from this number.”

But the calls allegedly continued.

Timeline of Events

  • Oct 9: Initial call and text from Rocket representative.
  • Oct 9 (3:51 PM): Wissart sends STOP request; receives confirmation.
  • Oct 10–29: Multiple calls from the same number, including Oct 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, and 29.
  • Oct 23: Second voicemail left by the representative.

Compliance Concerns

Federal telemarketing regulations require companies to honor do‑not‑call requests within ten business days. The lawsuit claims Rocket failed to maintain proper internal procedures for honoring consumer opt‑outs, as all calls and messages allegedly originated from the same number—indicating the STOP request likely never propagated through their system.

Wissart is not a Rocket customer and uses her phone strictly for personal communication. Her filing also notes that Rocket has been sued 55 prior times for alleged TCPA violations, raising continued questions about the company’s compliance infrastructure.

The Class Action Scope

Wissart seeks to represent two groups:

  • Nationwide consumers who sent an opt‑out text but received more than one subsequent call.
  • Florida residents who received any calls after opting out.

The complaint estimates that more than 10,000 people may qualify.

Potential Penalties

The case invokes both the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Florida’s Telephone Solicitation Act. These laws carry statutory penalties of $500 per unlawful call—and up to $1,500 if the violations are deemed willful.

Industry Takeaway

For mortgage lenders and other lead‑driven industries, the lawsuit highlights ongoing challenges with managing suppression lists and maintaining compliant outreach workflows across call, text, and digital channels. As marketing automation expands, clean data hygiene and synchronized opt‑out systems remain essential.

Rocket Mortgage has not yet filed a response, and no court has made any determination regarding the allegations.

More Articles

Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!

Alliance Formed by Four Major MLSs in the Southeast

Four of the largest Multiple Listing Services (MLSs) in the Southeast have recently formed an alliance, establishing a data sharing network aimed at increasing referral business among real estate agents. The Charleston Regional MLS in South Carolina, Canopy MLS in North Carolina, Georgia MLS, and Realtracs, the largest MLS in Alabama, Kentucky, and Tennessee, have come together to create the Southeast MLS Alliance. This strategic partnership will enable members of these four MLSs to access over 85,000 listings across Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, Tennessee, and South Carolina, providing real estate agents with valuable data and expanding their referral opportunities throughout the Southeast.

By |October 7, 2023|Categories: AI in Real Estate|Tags: |0 Comments

Family Support: A Solution to Surging Mortgage Rates

The current state of the mortgage market has presented prospective homebuyers with a significant challenge – surging mortgage rates. These rates have reached a 20-year high, hovering around 7.7%, making it increasingly difficult for borrowers to secure affordable loans. As a result, borrowers are actively seeking support from their family members to overcome this hurdle. To combat the impact of surging mortgage rates, borrowers are turning to their parents for financial assistance. This can take the form of gifted funds or by having parents become non-occupant co-borrowers. By involving family members in the mortgage process, borrowers can increase their chances of securing loans and achieving their homeownership goals.

By |October 7, 2023|Categories: Mortgage Rates|Tags: |0 Comments

Allegations Against Keller Williams Withdrawn by Franchisee

In a surprising turn of events, Inga Dow, a prominent Keller Williams franchisee and CEO of multiple Texas-based Keller Williams offices, has withdrawn her sexual misconduct lawsuit against the real estate giant. While Dow's claims against Keller Williams and its co-founder, Gary Keller, have been dropped, the lawsuit against former CEO John Davis remains ongoing. The outcome of this legal battle is still uncertain, and further details may emerge as the case progresses. Stay informed with Cameron Academy's online courses tailored to your needs and goals in the real estate industry.

By |October 6, 2023|Categories: Real Estate Industry|Tags: |0 Comments

Remote Online Notarization (RON) Legislation: A New Era in California

The recent approval of Remote Online Notarization (RON) legislation in California is a significant development that Cameron Academy is thrilled to discuss. This progressive bill, signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom, enables individuals to notarize their documents remotely using advanced audiovisual technology. The introduction of RON legislation in California brings about numerous advantages that revolutionize the notarization process. By embracing digital advancements, California is empowering individuals and businesses with enhanced convenience and accessibility, significant time and cost savings, improved security, and streamlined workflow.

The Hidden Realities of the Default and REO Industry Uncovered

"Even though mortgage origination volumes are down, we’re experiencing a highly competitive purchase market. That means a number of businesses, seeking to grow their revenue, will likely look to expand their reach to the default and REO space. However, venturing into this industry without proper knowledge and preparation can lead to serious consequences. By understanding the lessons learned from the past foreclosure wave and staying current with the changing environment, businesses can navigate the challenges and seize the opportunities presented by the default and REO market."

By |October 6, 2023|Categories: Default and REO Industry|Tags: |0 Comments

Legal Battle in Real Estate: NAR, Brokerages Allege Sitzer/Burnett Plaintiffs’ Attempt to Evade Cross Examination

In the ongoing legal battle involving the National Association of Realtors (NAR), Keller Williams, and HomeServices of America, a recent development has emerged. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit, known as the Sitzer/Burnett plaintiffs, have filed a notice to withdraw three named plaintiffs. This move is seen by the defendants as an attempt to avoid cross-examination. The lawsuit, initially filed in April 2019, challenges NAR's Participation Rule, which requires listing agents to offer compensation to buyers' agents in order to list a property on a Realtor-affiliated multiple listing service (MLS). The plaintiffs argue that this commission sharing inflates costs for consumers, in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. With the trial scheduled to start on October 16, the potential damages in this suit are estimated to be up to $4 billion.