Rocket Mortgage Hit with Class Action After Ignoring Opt-Out Requests

Legal gavel on documents

Rocket Mortgage is facing fresh legal trouble as a new lawsuit accuses the lender of continuing telemarketing outreach even after confirming that a consumer had successfully opted out. Filed November 12 in federal court in Florida, the complaint alleges violations of both federal and state telemarketing laws—and marks the 56th TCPA-related case brought against the company.

Key Claim: Rocket allegedly called a consumer twelve times after confirming she had been removed from future communications.

The Consumer’s Experience

Hillary Wissart of Kissimmee, Florida, says she visited RocketMortgage.com on October 9 to check mortgage rates. Just hours later, she received a voicemail from a representative identifying himself as Miguel Rodriguez, followed by a text message welcoming her to her “home financing journey” and offering an opt‑out option by replying “STOP.”

Wissart sent the STOP request immediately. Rocket responded with a confirmation: “You have successfully been unsubscribed. You will not receive any more messages from this number.”

But the calls allegedly continued.

Timeline of Events

  • Oct 9: Initial call and text from Rocket representative.
  • Oct 9 (3:51 PM): Wissart sends STOP request; receives confirmation.
  • Oct 10–29: Multiple calls from the same number, including Oct 14, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, and 29.
  • Oct 23: Second voicemail left by the representative.

Compliance Concerns

Federal telemarketing regulations require companies to honor do‑not‑call requests within ten business days. The lawsuit claims Rocket failed to maintain proper internal procedures for honoring consumer opt‑outs, as all calls and messages allegedly originated from the same number—indicating the STOP request likely never propagated through their system.

Wissart is not a Rocket customer and uses her phone strictly for personal communication. Her filing also notes that Rocket has been sued 55 prior times for alleged TCPA violations, raising continued questions about the company’s compliance infrastructure.

The Class Action Scope

Wissart seeks to represent two groups:

  • Nationwide consumers who sent an opt‑out text but received more than one subsequent call.
  • Florida residents who received any calls after opting out.

The complaint estimates that more than 10,000 people may qualify.

Potential Penalties

The case invokes both the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act and Florida’s Telephone Solicitation Act. These laws carry statutory penalties of $500 per unlawful call—and up to $1,500 if the violations are deemed willful.

Industry Takeaway

For mortgage lenders and other lead‑driven industries, the lawsuit highlights ongoing challenges with managing suppression lists and maintaining compliant outreach workflows across call, text, and digital channels. As marketing automation expands, clean data hygiene and synchronized opt‑out systems remain essential.

Rocket Mortgage has not yet filed a response, and no court has made any determination regarding the allegations.

More Articles

Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!

Los Alamitos at a Breaking Point After 18 Racehorse Deaths Spur Emergency Safety Demands

Los Alamitos Race Course is facing its most serious crisis in years after 18 horses died in 2025, prompting regulators to warn the track that its racing license is at risk without immediate safety reforms. Following three catastrophic injuries in a single day, the California Horse Racing Board has ordered urgent changes—including more veterinarians, stricter medication rules, and enhanced on‑track medical support—as pressure mounts for stronger oversight in a sport already under national scrutiny.

Why Canadian Investors Are Flooding U.S. Real Estate Despite Tariffs and Tensions

Canadian investors have poured more than US$5.8 billion into U.S. commercial real estate this year, making the U.S. their top destination even amid a lingering tariff dispute. Tight inventory in Canada and greater deal availability south of the border are driving the trend, with data centers and industrial properties emerging as the hottest targets for 2025.

Florida’s Insurance Chief Warns Homeowners: Most Don’t Understand Their Policies

Florida’s insurance commissioner says even industry pros struggle to read today’s 150‑page homeowners policies—leaving residents shocked when hurricane claims are denied. With rising premiums, high replacement costs, and widespread confusion over exclusions like flood and water damage, the state is pushing for simpler, clearer policy language so homeowners know what they’re actually covered for before the next storm hits.

Post‑Election Power Plays: How Major U.S. Cities Are Quietly Redrawing the Real Estate Map

Following the 2025 elections, major metros like New York, Chicago, Miami, Los Angeles, and Boston are implementing policy shifts that could reshape property values, rental income, development timelines, and investment strategy heading into 2026. From New York’s push toward aggressive rent reform to Chicago’s sustainability mandates and Miami’s uncertain mayoral runoff, these changes signal a new era where local politics increasingly dictate market performance. This breakdown highlights the biggest post‑election real estate pivots and what they mean for investors, agents, and finance professionals preparing for a rapidly evolving landscape.

Florida Insurance Boss Drops a Truth Bomb: Most Homeowners Have No Idea What They’re Actually Covered For

Florida’s Insurance Commissioner is sounding the alarm after thousands of homeowners discovered—only after hurricanes Helene and Milton—that the coverage they thought they had didn’t exist. With nearly 150,000 unpaid claims tied to misunderstood flood exclusions, water‑damage caps, and buried policy clauses, state leaders are pushing to simplify the dense, confusing documents most Floridians never read. As insurance costs remain one of the state’s top concerns, this growing complexity is creating a massive opportunity for real estate, mortgage, and insurance professionals to guide consumers before disaster strikes.

Florida’s Insurance “Fixes” Backfire as Homeowners Face Higher Costs and Riskier Insurers

Florida’s insurance market is reliving an old crisis under a new name. Despite reforms meant to stabilize the system, homeowners are being forced out of Citizens and into pricier policies from small insurers with shaky financial histories. Companies tied to past insolvencies are returning with fresh branding, while highly rated carriers continue to deny a majority of claims. With political influence muddying regulation and climate risks rising, experts warn that only a full structural overhaul—not cosmetic reforms—can restore confidence for homeowners, agents, and the entire real estate market.