As the clock ticks toward a December 31 deadline, a major House subcommittee is considering 15 bills aimed at expanding access to telehealth services. This legislative push is crucial as pandemic-era flexibilities face expiration, potentially affecting countless patients who have come to rely on virtual care.
The American Telemedicine Association has dubbed 2024 the “Super Bowl” of telehealth regulation, advocating for the permanent establishment of Medicare flexibilities introduced during COVID-19. According to FierceHealthcare, this regulatory showdown is critical for the future of telehealth.
The Push for Permanency
Healthcare systems and providers are urging lawmakers to secure permanent Medicare coverage for telehealth services. The absence of legislative action could result in a significant loss of access, particularly for vulnerable populations. Lee Schwamm, M.D., from Yale New Haven Health System, emphasized the need for permanent solutions, stating that telehealth allows for patient-centered care, especially when in-person visits pose challenges.
Prior to the pandemic, telehealth was often a cash-only service, inaccessible to many. However, the integration of virtual and in-person care has become a new standard, as highlighted by Eve Cunningham, M.D., from Providence health system. Telehealth now represents about 20% of ambulatory care visits at Providence, and its services extend to rural and underserved urban areas.
Legislative Proposals
Two significant bills, the CONNECT for Health Act and the Telehealth Modernization Act, aim to solidify telehealth flexibilities. These proposals seek to remove geographic restrictions, expand provider eligibility, and extend audio-only telehealth coverage. The American Hospital Association supports these measures, citing telehealth’s potential to address clinician shortages and enhance patient care.
Debate Over Costs and Quality
While telehealth has shown promise in improving chronic disease management and reducing emergency visits, concerns about increased healthcare spending remain. A previous extension was estimated to raise Medicare costs by over $2 billion. However, experts like Ateev Mehrotra, M.D., argue that the value of telehealth should guide policy decisions, despite modest spending increases.
Payment parity is another contentious issue. Some advocate for lower reimbursement rates for telehealth, while others, like Schwamm, caution against significant pay cuts that could discourage virtual care. The ongoing debate highlights the need for a balanced approach to telehealth reimbursement.
Fred Riccardi from the Medicare Rights Center urged for greater oversight before expanding Medicare coverage for telehealth. The organization emphasizes policies that increase access, promote health equity, and ensure high-quality care.
Conclusion
As lawmakers deliberate these legislative moves, the future of telehealth hangs in the balance. The decisions made in the coming months will shape the landscape of healthcare delivery, determining whether telehealth remains a core function or reverts to a limited service.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Florida’s insurance market is under intense pressure as millions of residents and trillions in property wealth cluster along hurricane‑vulnerable coastlines. This article breaks down how decades of growth in high‑risk zones created today’s crisis, why traditional pricing models can’t keep up, and what real estate and insurance professionals must do to stay ahead. It offers actionable insights on underwriting, risk communication, policy partnerships, and resilience planning—critical knowledge for anyone advising Florida homeowners or navigating the state’s evolving insurance landscape.
Florida’s homeowners insurance market may have stabilized, but not in the way residents hoped. After years of runaway increases, premiums have stopped spiking—but they’re holding at painfully high levels. Coastal properties remain the hardest hit, with some policies topping $15,000 a year, while insurers continue demanding costly upgrades and resisting calls for transparency. For real estate professionals, understanding these pricing pressures is becoming essential as insurance costs increasingly shape buyer decisions across the state.
Florida homeowners face soaring premiums, shrinking insurer options, and storms that grow stronger each year. This article breaks down what hurricane insurance actually covers, how deductibles really work, why flood insurance is essential, and what professionals in real estate, mortgage, and insurance must understand to protect clients and properties before the next major storm hits.
Teresa King Kinney, one of the most influential executives in modern real estate, is retiring after 33 years as CEO of the MIAMI Association of Realtors. Under her leadership, the organization grew from 5,000 members to 60,000, became a global real estate powerhouse, and built the nation’s largest association‑owned MLS. As she transitions into CEO Emeritus, MIAMI prepares for a new era shaped by the foundation she spent decades building.
Miami’s commercial property market is heating up again, posting an 11% jump in investment volume for 2025. The surge is driven largely by a revitalized retail sector fueled by population growth, strong tourism, and new mixed‑use development. While office and industrial activity remains steady but softer, investor confidence is returning as Miami’s CRE landscape matures and buyers re‑enter the market with renewed interest in high‑traffic retail opportunities.
The Federal Reserve is preparing major changes to mortgage regulations in an effort to pull more mortgage activity back into the banking sector. With banks losing significant market share to nonbank lenders over the past decade, Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman says new proposals may ease capital requirements and make mortgage servicing more attractive for banks. These shifts could have wide‑ranging effects on real estate professionals, lenders, and borrowers as the balance of power in the mortgage market begins to shift once again.
