The history of standardized testing in the United States is steeped in controversy and criticism, particularly regarding its impact on students of color. From their inception over a century ago, these tests have been criticized as instruments of systemic racism and bias. As noted by the National Education Association, standardized tests have historically marginalized students of color, particularly those from low-income families.
Notably, educational researchers like Ibram X. Kendi have been vocal about the inherent biases in these assessments. Kendi, a prominent figure at the Antiracist Research & Policy Center, argues that standardized tests have been used as tools to degrade Black and Brown minds, excluding them from prestigious educational opportunities.
Historical Context
The origins of these tests can be traced back to the early 20th century, when figures like psychologist and eugenicist Carl Brigham played pivotal roles in their development. Brigham, who was instrumental in the creation of the SAT, believed in the superiority of certain races, a belief that influenced the design and implementation of these tests.
Shortly after the publication of “A Study of American Intelligence” in 1923, the College Board commissioned Carl Brigham to lead development of the SAT.
As the U.S. absorbed millions of immigrants, standardized tests were used to segregate and categorize students, often to their detriment. These biases have had lasting effects, contributing to educational disparities that persist today.
Modern Implications
Today, there is a growing movement to resist the overuse and misuse of standardized testing. Critics argue that these tests fail to accurately measure student learning and often exacerbate educational inequalities. Instead, there is a push for more authentic assessment methods that reflect a broader range of student skills and learning.
“The tests have failed time and again to achieve their intended purposes: measuring intelligence and predicting future academic and professional success. The tests, not the black test-takers, have been underachieving.” – Ibram X. Kendi
Efforts to reform these assessment systems are gaining traction, with educators and civil rights organizations advocating for changes that do not perpetuate racial and economic inequalities. As the National Education Association emphasizes, the focus should be on promoting assessments that support the academic, social, and emotional needs of students.
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
In a landmark decision, the court has preliminarily approved settlement agreements in the commission lawsuits involving real estate companies RE/MAX and Anywhere Real Estate. The agreements require RE/MAX to pay $55 million and Anywhere Real Estate to pay $83.5 million. As part of the settlements, both companies will implement significant policy and practice changes, including the elimination of the requirement for agents to be members of the National Association of Realtors. This change will provide agents with more flexibility and independence in their business practices. The settlements have far-reaching implications for the real estate industry, fostering a more dynamic and customer-centric real estate market.
The housing market saw a remarkable increase in housing starts and permits in October, pointing to a positive industry trend. This surge suggests a growing demand among Americans for homeownership, prompting builders to respond by ramping up their construction efforts. However, builder confidence has been somewhat dampened by elevated mortgage rates. The housing market's performance varied across different regions in the United States, highlighting the diverse nature of the housing market and the various factors influencing construction trends.
CUSO Home Lending has implemented Dark Matter Technologies' advanced Empower loan origination system, revolutionizing the credit union lending process. The Empower system streamlines loan applications, automates document collection and verification, and facilitates seamless communication between borrowers, loan officers, and underwriters. With robust security measures and full compliance with industry regulations, the system ensures the protection of sensitive information. This move highlights the importance of embracing digital transformation in the lending industry.
United Wholesale Mortgage (UWM), a leading wholesale lender in the mortgage industry, has launched a new initiative offering no-cost appraisals on 1-0 temporary rate buydowns. This strategic move aims to attract more brokers by covering up to $600 of the appraisal cost on all conventional and government-backed home loans. Temporary rate buydowns allow borrowers to pay a lower mortgage rate during the initial period of their loans, making homeownership more affordable. This limited-time opportunity until March 31 provides brokers with a unique value proposition for their clients. Ready to explore the benefits of UWM's temporary rate buydowns and no-cost appraisals? Connect with UWM today.
Mark Willis has made a significant leadership change by returning as the CEO of Keller Williams, a leading player in the real estate industry. This news marks a triumphant comeback for Willis, who previously served as the CEO of Keller Williams from 2005 to 2014. Armed with extensive experience and a proven track record, Willis aims to steer Keller Williams towards continued success and navigate the challenges facing the real estate industry. This article will delve into Willis' career history, the growth of Keller Williams under his leadership, and the current landscape of the real estate market.
A recent lawsuit in Texas has sent shockwaves through the real estate industry, shedding light on alleged collusion among individual brokers, real estate teams, and large corporate brokerages. The lawsuit, filed by the QJ Team and other plaintiffs, accuses these entities of artificially inflating real estate agent commissions. The real estate industry has been rocked by a series of commission lawsuits in recent years, but the QJ Team lawsuit stands out due to its comprehensive list of defendants. The QJ Team lawsuit alleges that the defendants engaged in collusion to artificially inflate real estate agent commissions, thereby restricting competition and harming consumers. The plaintiffs claim that these entities conspired to set and maintain high commission rates, limiting the ability of homebuyers and sellers to negotiate fair prices. If proven true, these allegations could have far-reaching consequences for the real estate industry in Texas.
