As families consider relocating, the quality of local public schools often becomes a pivotal factor. The allure of modern athletic facilities, spacious classrooms, and cutting-edge technology in science and computer labs can be irresistible for parents who equate these attributes with a superior education. But, as a recent study from Yale Insights explores, does the financial investment in school infrastructure genuinely enhance educational outcomes?
Barbara Biasi, an Assistant Professor of Economics at Yale SOM, alongside her colleagues Julien Lafortune and David Schönholzer, delved into this question. Their research, which spans data from across the United States, seeks to unravel the complex relationship between capital spending on schools and its impact on educational quality and real estate prices. For those interested in a deeper dive, the full article can be found here.
The study’s findings indicate that while capital projects generally increase both test scores and property values, the benefits are predominantly seen in districts with disadvantaged students. Interestingly, the type of capital project plays a crucial role in determining its impact. Projects focused on infrastructure improvements, such as HVAC systems, significantly enhance test scores but do not necessarily raise property values. Conversely, investments in visible amenities like athletic facilities tend to boost property prices.
Biasi’s research highlights a critical consideration for voters who decide on capital proposals. She emphasizes the importance of understanding whether these investments will truly benefit students or merely serve to increase local property values. As she notes, “Public schools are supposed to be free, but really people are paying for the best public school they can afford.”
Implications for Policy and Community
This study raises essential questions about the role of voters in making decisions that impact educational infrastructure. With the majority of voters not being parents, there’s a risk that the benefits of certain projects may not be fully appreciated or prioritized. Biasi hopes that this research will encourage a more informed discussion around school funding and its implications for both students and the broader community.
Looking ahead, Biasi and her team plan to explore how different funding rules across states affect the approval and impact of capital projects. This next phase aims to provide further insights into how modifications in funding rules could potentially reshape the educational landscape.
For more insights from Barbara Biasi and her team, visit her profile on Yale Insights.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Artificial intelligence is speeding ahead, but real estate is discovering a hard truth: AI can’t work well on messy, inconsistent, and siloed data. Unlike finance or e‑commerce, the industry has never agreed on shared definitions or standardized frameworks, making it difficult for AI tools to interpret information at scale. Now, leaders across real estate are realizing that the real breakthrough won’t come from smarter algorithms—it will come from finally unifying the industry’s fragmented data so AI can deliver its full value.
Manhattan’s iconic Waldorf Astoria is hitting the market again—and its billion‑dollar price tag may reveal whether commercial real estate is finally recovering. After years of inflation, shutdowns, and stalled investment, new forecasts from major firms show growing optimism, making this sale a critical test for the 2026 market.
Homeowners across Florida are facing sharp increases in their escrow payments as insurance premiums continue to rise. With insurers leaving the state, rates climbing, and replacement policies costing far more, many residents are experiencing sudden spikes in their monthly mortgage bills. These escalating insurance-driven escrow costs are reshaping affordability, influencing buyer qualifications, and redefining financial stability for Floridians and the broader real estate market.
The modern MLS marketplace is one of real estate’s greatest success stories: transparent, efficient, and designed to help buyers and sellers win. But its very effectiveness has sparked a new risk — professionals looking to “stand out” by limiting exposure and restricting information. Research shows that full MLS visibility can boost a seller’s price by $50,000 to $75,000, yet off‑market tactics threaten to chip away at the system that delivers those gains. The MLS doesn’t need replacing; it needs thoughtful upgrades and well‑trained professionals who know how to protect and leverage its power.
Florida homeowners are being hit with a new kind of sticker shock as rising insurance premiums push escrow payments sharply higher, adding hundreds of dollars to monthly mortgage bills. The surge is reshaping budgets, impacting buyer qualification, and redefining affordability across the state. With insurers pulling back and premiums climbing faster than wages, both current owners and hopeful buyers must now navigate a market where insurance risk—not just home price—plays a major role in the true cost of living in the Sunshine State.
Florida’s mobile and manufactured homes are surging in popularity, but insuring them requires specialized HO-7 coverage designed for structures built off-site and more vulnerable to wind and weather. With rising premiums, unique risks, and new 2026 market shifts, homeowners and industry professionals need to understand what these policies cover, what they don’t, which insurers are leading the pack, and how to save without sacrificing protection.
