As families consider relocating, the quality of local public schools often becomes a pivotal factor. The allure of modern athletic facilities, spacious classrooms, and cutting-edge technology in science and computer labs can be irresistible for parents who equate these attributes with a superior education. But, as a recent study from Yale Insights explores, does the financial investment in school infrastructure genuinely enhance educational outcomes?
Barbara Biasi, an Assistant Professor of Economics at Yale SOM, alongside her colleagues Julien Lafortune and David Schönholzer, delved into this question. Their research, which spans data from across the United States, seeks to unravel the complex relationship between capital spending on schools and its impact on educational quality and real estate prices. For those interested in a deeper dive, the full article can be found here.
The study’s findings indicate that while capital projects generally increase both test scores and property values, the benefits are predominantly seen in districts with disadvantaged students. Interestingly, the type of capital project plays a crucial role in determining its impact. Projects focused on infrastructure improvements, such as HVAC systems, significantly enhance test scores but do not necessarily raise property values. Conversely, investments in visible amenities like athletic facilities tend to boost property prices.
Biasi’s research highlights a critical consideration for voters who decide on capital proposals. She emphasizes the importance of understanding whether these investments will truly benefit students or merely serve to increase local property values. As she notes, “Public schools are supposed to be free, but really people are paying for the best public school they can afford.”
Implications for Policy and Community
This study raises essential questions about the role of voters in making decisions that impact educational infrastructure. With the majority of voters not being parents, there’s a risk that the benefits of certain projects may not be fully appreciated or prioritized. Biasi hopes that this research will encourage a more informed discussion around school funding and its implications for both students and the broader community.
Looking ahead, Biasi and her team plan to explore how different funding rules across states affect the approval and impact of capital projects. This next phase aims to provide further insights into how modifications in funding rules could potentially reshape the educational landscape.
For more insights from Barbara Biasi and her team, visit her profile on Yale Insights.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Florida homeowners — especially in hard‑hit South Florida — are set to see rare and substantial reductions in their property insurance premiums. Gov. Ron DeSantis announced an average statewide Citizens Insurance decrease of 8.7%, with even larger savings of up to 14% in counties like Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach. State officials credit recent legal and regulatory reforms for stabilizing the market, attracting new insurers, and delivering the first meaningful rate relief Floridians have seen in years.
Tampa’s commercial real estate market isn’t slowing—it’s maturing. With strong population growth, rising office demand, a normalized industrial sector, resurgent retail, and an emerging health‑care real estate boom, investors are shifting from speed to strategy. Tighter underwriting, cautious capital and increased due‑diligence are shaping a more disciplined market, creating new opportunities for informed professionals.
Florida homeowners are finally seeing relief as Citizens Property Insurance announces a major 8.7% average rate decrease—far larger than originally proposed. Driven by legislative reforms, fewer lawsuits, and a calm hurricane season, the state’s once‑unstable insurance market is showing real signs of recovery. But with reduced coverage limits and shifting legal protections, experts warn that lower premiums may come with hidden trade‑offs.
After a decade of rising premiums and retreating carriers, Florida homeowners are finally seeing long‑awaited relief. Dozens of insurers have filed for rate decreases—some as high as 11%—thanks to legislative reforms and a stabilizing market. Early approvals are already hitting counties across the state, and experts say the momentum could boost buyer confidence, affordability, and competition throughout Florida’s real estate and insurance sectors.
After years of slowed activity caused by rising interest rates, the self‑storage industry is heating up again. New data from Marcus & Millichap shows a fresh market cycle emerging, driven by renewed buyer confidence, recalibrated pricing, and stronger lender participation. Acquisitions are rebounding, development is resetting in a healthier direction, and financing conditions are improving—creating one of the most promising investment landscapes the sector has seen in years.
Brookline’s newly updated FEMA flood maps identify 97 high‑risk parcels, but local experts warn the true threat is far greater. While FEMA highlights river‑based flooding around Leverett Pond and the Muddy River, alternative models show more than 1,300 Brookline properties at risk within 30 years. Hidden vulnerabilities along major corridors like Beacon Street, rising rainfall intensity, aging infrastructure, and climate‑driven storm patterns suggest that many “low‑risk” areas may be anything but safe.
