The Surprising Truth Behind America’s Housing Crisis: Why Deregulation Isn’t the Fix

Rent control protest

Every few months, a familiar message resurfaces in housing policy debates: if cities would simply “deregulate” and eliminate zoning restrictions, housing would become magically affordable. But a groundbreaking academic study challenges this long‑held assumption—and the findings are shaking the foundation of the deregulation narrative.

According to the research, conducted by four leading urban scholars, the true driver of America’s affordability crisis isn’t zoning, regulations, or construction slowdowns.

It’s economic inequality—pure and simple.

Why Deregulation Isn’t the Golden Ticket

The authors modeled several major U.S. cities, including San Francisco, and demonstrated that even if construction boomed at unrealistically high levels, rents would barely move for decades. Their mathematical simulation found it could take up to 100 years of extraordinary housing production to bring rents down to levels ordinary workers could afford.

“The simulation makes clear it is unrealistic to think that we can deregulate and build our way out of the affordability crisis with market-rate housing, even with large positive supply shocks.”

Even one of the study’s lead authors, UCLA professor Michael Storper, has repeatedly warned that deregulation can actually worsen displacement in high-demand areas.

Upzoning Has Benefits—But Not the Ones You Think

The authors don’t villainize upzoning. In fact, it has real perks: improved access to jobs, shorter commutes, and reduced carbon emissions. But there’s a catch—those perks make neighborhoods more desirable, often pushing prices up, not down.

“Upzoning may be desirable from some policy perspectives, but it is not a robust tool to increase affordability.”

The Real Culprit: Wealth Gaps and Inequality

The study reinforces findings from the National Bureau of Economic Research: housing prices follow income growth, not zoning policy. Even places with minimal zoning—like Houston—or shrinking cities like Cleveland continue to face affordability issues because wage gaps are widening.

San Francisco, for example, saw both mean rent and mean income rise roughly 600% between 1980 and 2019. But workers without degrees saw far smaller income gains. That widening gulf is the core of the crisis.

“Rising national inequality and the spatial sorting of economic activity have reshaped regional labor markets and incomes.”

The Tax Factor No One Talks About

The mid‑20th century—a period often remembered as an era of affordable American housing—had something the modern era doesn’t: extremely high marginal tax rates for the wealthy. That suppressed inequality and pumped more money into middle‑income households.

Today, wealth is concentrated in stock options and investments—many lightly taxed or not taxed at all.

Developers Aren’t the Villains—But the Market Has Limits

The study highlights an emerging economic idea: option value. Developers often hold off on construction when they expect future profits to be higher. Ironically, regulations can sometimes push them to build sooner, not later.

Even in wildly optimistic scenarios—tens of thousands of new units built every year—rents wouldn’t fall meaningfully for decades. One projection estimated 124 years before the average working-class resident could afford typical rent.

If Inequality Isn’t Addressed, No Policy Will Fix Housing

The authors warn that unless the U.S. confronts its economic divides, housing policy tweaks like upzoning amount to little more than rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

“We can’t solve our problem now until there is a radical redistribution of economic and political power.” — Martin Luther King Jr.

This is the conversation cities urgently need—not just how many units we can squeeze onto land, but how income inequality shapes every corner of the housing market.

What This Means for Real Estate Professionals

For agents, mortgage brokers, investors, and anyone navigating today’s volatile market, understanding these dynamics is essential. Markets aren’t shaped by zoning alone—they’re driven by wage trends, economic forces, and investor expectations.

This is why institutions like Cameron Academy emphasize economic literacy alongside licensing. Today’s professionals must understand not just the laws—but the forces behind them.

Explore the Original Reporting

This article draws from excellent investigative reporting by Tim Redmond at 48 Hills. Explore the full story here:

New study shows that deregulation is not the answer to the affordable housing crisis – 48 Hills

Join their community discussion on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

More Articles

Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!

Commercial Real Estate Steadies as Confidence Strengthens in Late 2025

The commercial real estate sector closed out 2025 with renewed stability, as the Real Estate Roundtable’s latest sentiment index shows rising confidence and improving market fundamentals. Executives report better access to capital, stronger performance in residential, retail, and hospitality, and early signs of recovery in the office market. With financing loosening and asset values climbing, the outlook for 2026 is increasingly optimistic, creating fresh opportunities for both seasoned professionals and newcomers preparing to enter the field.

What the CFPB’s New Disparate Impact Proposal Could Mean for Lenders and Real Estate Pros

The CFPB is proposing changes to how lenders evaluate “disparate impact” under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, potentially tightening the scrutiny on credit decisions that unintentionally disadvantage protected groups. These updates could reshape underwriting models, lending criteria, and compliance requirements — ultimately influencing mortgage approvals, buyer qualifications, and day‑to‑day real estate activity.

Florida’s Insurance Battle Heats Up: The 2026 Political Showdown Every Property Professional Should Watch

Florida’s insurance crisis has become the defining issue heading into 2026, with Republicans touting recent market improvements while Democrats argue families are still being crushed by soaring premiums. From billion‑dollar auto insurance refunds to condo markets destabilized by post‑Surfside rate spikes, the state’s political divide is shaping the future of real estate, insurance, and affordability for millions.

Insurance Regulation Takes Center Stage: Key Changes Professionals Must Watch This Month

October 2025 brought a wave of major regulatory updates across insurance, finance, and compliance. From stricter oversight on retail insurers and new FCA rules on ESG and travel insurance, to EIOPA’s EU‑wide consultations and refreshed corporate governance standards, regulators signaled higher expectations and faster change ahead. For professionals—and those pursuing licenses—these shifts directly impact risk management, product design, and consumer outcomes, making regulatory awareness a critical competitive advantage.

Commercial Real Estate Lending Roars Back in Q3 as Confidence Surges Across the Market

After nearly two years of sluggish activity, commercial real estate lending is finally accelerating—fast. New data from CBRE shows loan closings jumped 112% year‑over‑year in Q3 2025, reaching their highest level since 2018. With interest rates stabilizing and credit spreads tightening, investors are returning, banks are re‑entering the market, and multifamily financing is dominating once again. The long‑stalled deal flow is thawing, signaling renewed momentum heading into 2026.

Farmers Insurance Reopens California Market but Seeks Nearly 7 Percent Rate Hike

Farmers Insurance is lifting its cap on new homeowner policies in California after two years of limiting growth, signaling a shift in the state’s strained insurance market. The expansion comes with a proposed 6.99 percent rate increase that still needs regulatory approval. Supporters call it a turning point driven by new wildfire‑risk rules, while consumer advocates warn the reforms contain loopholes and could lead to higher costs for homeowners.