Transforming Boston’s Schools: A Simple Yet Powerful Idea
On a bright spring morning at John Hay Community Academy in Chicago, a scene unfolds that could hold the key to transforming Boston’s public schools. Three first-graders, Faye, Ka’mari, and A’Kyng, are eagerly participating in a high-dosage tutoring session. This method, which involves intensive, individualized instruction, has shown remarkable promise in improving academic performance.
Just across the hall, Felicia Mason, a dedicated member of the school district’s Tutor Corps, is guiding her young charges through a series of words. With each correct pronunciation, the children’s excitement grows—a testament to the effectiveness of this educational intervention.
High-dosage tutoring is not just another educational fad; it is backed by extensive research. Studies have demonstrated that this approach can significantly enhance learning outcomes, often outperforming other popular strategies like extended school days or summer programs. In fact, a pair of randomized control trials conducted in Chicago a decade ago found that high-dosage tutoring doubled or tripled the learning of low-income Black and Latino high school students.
The COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to test the scalability of this intervention. With federal funding pouring into academic recovery, districts across the country, including Boston, were encouraged to adopt evidence-based strategies like high-dosage tutoring. While some states and districts have embraced this approach, Boston has yet to make it a priority.
The Boston Connection
Interestingly, Boston is the birthplace of the high-dosage tutoring movement. Match Charter Public High School, which opened at the turn of the century, pioneered this approach. By employing a “Match Corps” of live-in tutors, the school transformed its student body into one of the highest achieving in the state.
Despite its origins, Boston has not fully embraced high-dosage tutoring in its public schools. The city has experimented with the intervention in a small number of schools, but it has not been prioritized. With a wealth of underutilized school buildings and a rich philanthropic infrastructure, Boston is well-positioned to implement a robust high-dosage tutoring program.
The Boston Globe editorial board argues that Boston should seriously consider investing in high-quality, high-dosage tutoring. The potential benefits are immense—not only in terms of academic achievement but also in addressing long-standing achievement gaps between white students and students of color.
Scaling Up
Scaling up high-dosage tutoring presents challenges, particularly in terms of cost and labor. However, innovative solutions, such as remote and hybrid tutoring models, offer promising pathways to expand these programs. By leveraging technology, districts can tap into a wider pool of qualified tutors, thereby reducing costs and increasing reach.
In Chicago, for example, the district has partnered with Saga Education to implement a hybrid tutoring model. This approach combines self-guided computer lessons with live, remote tutoring sessions, allowing more students to benefit from high-dosage tutoring.
As Boston considers its educational future, it would do well to learn from these examples. By investing in high-dosage tutoring, the city can provide its students with the best learning conditions possible. The potential for transformative change is within reach—Boston just needs to take the leap.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Just 48 hours after NAR unveiled major revisions to its MLS policies, plaintiffs in the Michigan-based Hardy lawsuit moved to use those changes as evidence, arguing they prove NAR’s prior rules were anticompetitive. NAR denies any wrongdoing, but the case is quickly becoming a key test for whether MLS access should require Realtor membership — a question now echoing across multiple states and potentially reshaping how real estate professionals nationwide access the industry’s most essential tool.
Florida homeowners are now paying some of the highest insurance premiums in the country, with average costs topping $5,800 per year—nearly double the national average. Residents report skyrocketing rates, denied claims, and tough choices between costly coverage and financial risk. As frustration grows, lawmakers and consumer advocates are pushing new reforms aimed at increasing transparency, capping rate hikes, and protecting policyholders in one of the nation’s most volatile insurance markets.
Economic uncertainty, rapid AI adoption, tighter capital flows, and rising portfolio risk are reshaping the 2026 commercial real estate landscape. From shifting workforce patterns to a national housing attainability crisis, the industry is entering a data‑driven, fundamentals‑focused era—making adaptability, education, and tech literacy essential for real estate professionals.
Mortgage rates have climbed to 6.23 percent as investors grow doubtful that the Federal Reserve will deliver a rate cut in December. A soft but unclear jobs report and persistent inflation have pushed borrowing costs higher, reversing October’s brief relief in the housing market. Real estate and mortgage professionals should prepare clients for continued volatility as the Fed’s December meeting approaches.
After years of tight inventory, high mortgage rates, and sluggish sales, economists say 2026 is shaping up to be the turnaround real estate professionals have been waiting for. NAR projects a 14 percent jump in home sales, mortgage rates easing toward 6 percent, and buyer demand finally gaining momentum. While higher‑end homes are moving quickly, first‑time buyers continue to face affordability challenges, and price reductions are reappearing as sellers adjust to shifting conditions. For Florida agents, brokers, and newcomers, the stage is being set for a busy and opportunity‑rich year.
Florida’s average homeowner insurance premium has soared to $5,838 a year—almost $3,000 above the national average—pushing many residents to the financial brink. From tripled premiums to lowball claim payouts, homeowners are speaking out as frustration mounts. Some are even dropping coverage entirely. With more than 40% of claims closed without payment and policy cancellations at record levels, lawmakers are pushing for reforms, but political hurdles remain. The outcome could reshape Florida real estate, insurance, and mortgage markets for years to come.
