In the bustling arena of American politics, where clashes are common and agreements rare, Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump find common ground on an issue that strikes at the heart of many voters: the escalating cost of housing.
Both leaders acknowledge the pressing need for more housing, but their strategies diverge significantly. As housing costs continue to rise, outpacing wages and burdening renters, the stakes are high for their respective plans to resonate with the public.
Kamala Harris’s Vision for Affordable Housing
Vice President Harris brings a personal touch to her housing agenda, reflecting on her mother’s journey to homeownership. Her plan is a blend of increasing housing supply and providing financial support to aspiring homeowners. Harris aims to build three million new housing units, a goal she believes will alleviate the housing shortage and reduce costs.
To achieve this, Harris proposes expanding existing tax credits for affordable rental housing and introducing new incentives for building starter homes. Her plan includes a $40 billion fund to innovate housing construction and a $25,000 down payment assistance for first-time buyers, although some economists argue this could inadvertently drive prices higher.
Harris also targets corporate landlords, advocating for legislation to remove tax breaks from large investors and curb rent-increasing algorithms. Her comprehensive approach seeks to address both supply and demand in the housing market.
Donald Trump’s Approach to Housing Costs
Former President Trump’s housing strategy, while less detailed, focuses on deregulation and opening federal lands for development. Trump has frequently mentioned the need to build more homes and reduce regulatory barriers, echoing some of Harris’s sentiments.
Trump also emphasizes lowering mortgage rates, although the president does not directly set these rates. He links high mortgage rates to inflation and promises to bring them down by curbing inflation, despite critiques that some of his economic policies might exacerbate it.
Immigration and Housing
Trump and his vice-presidential nominee, JD Vance, have attributed rising housing costs to undocumented immigrants, suggesting that reducing illegal immigration would alleviate the pressure on housing prices. However, experts like Albert Saiz from MIT argue that while population growth can affect housing demand, the impact of immigration on prices is relatively small.
Trump’s proposed mass deportation of undocumented immigrants could decrease housing demand but might also lead to a shortage of construction workers, potentially increasing building costs.
As the 2024 election approaches, both candidates will need to convince voters that their housing strategies can effectively address the affordability crisis. For a deeper dive into their plans, the original NPR article provides comprehensive insights.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Long Island’s commercial real estate market just smashed every previous record, hitting an unprecedented $4.1 billion in 2025 deal volume—up a massive 71.5 percent from the year before. A surge in specialty-use properties like assisted living centers and self-storage facilities fueled the boom, alongside hundreds of new transactions across Nassau and Suffolk counties. With investor confidence rebounding, interest rates easing, and new buyer profiles entering the scene, the region has become one of the hottest real estate markets to watch.
Federal cuts to housing oversight in 2026 are creating a nationwide regulatory scramble, with states—especially California—rapidly stepping in to fill the gap. As the CFPB reduces its enforcement role, lawmakers and agencies across the country are crafting their own rules on mortgage compliance, consumer protection, affordability, and even AI‑driven underwriting. For real estate, mortgage, and finance professionals, the message is clear: state regulations are becoming just as influential as federal policy, making ongoing education and compliance awareness more critical than ever.
The insurance industry poured an eye‑opening $172 million into federal lobbying in 2025, making it the fourth‑largest lobbying sector in the country. Medical insurers led the spending, but property and casualty giants weren’t far behind, with APCIA, Nationwide, Liberty Mutual, and Allstate all landing among the top contributors. And this is only federal spending—state‑level influence, where regulations are truly shaped, remains vastly underreported. For professionals in insurance, real estate, and finance, these lobbying efforts play a powerful role in shaping regulations, costs, and the competitive landscape.
Florida’s home insurance market saw a 3.35% non-renewal rate last year—a small percentage that translated into hundreds of thousands of homeowners suddenly losing coverage. Driven by repeated storm damage, soaring construction costs, heavy litigation, and insurers pulling back from high-risk areas, the state’s insurance landscape is rapidly shifting. Homeowners now face higher premiums, fewer options, and tougher underwriting, while professionals in real estate, mortgage, and insurance must stay informed to guide clients through a tightening market.
Florida’s recent tort reforms are doing far more than reshaping the state’s legal system—they’re driving down property and casualty insurance costs by an average of 14.5% and injecting over $4.2 billion into the state’s economy each year. With nearly 30,000 jobs supported and state and local governments seeing hundreds of millions in new tax revenue, the changes are already transforming Florida’s insurance market. Lawsuits have dropped, insurers are returning, and businesses and homeowners alike are reaping the benefits of a more balanced, competitive, and financially resilient environment.
Major commercial real estate firms are reporting strong revenue and renewed market activity, signaling a rebound in dealmaking and office demand. Yet even with record earnings, CEOs from CBRE, Colliers, and Marcus & Millichap spent much of their earnings calls addressing a growing concern: whether artificial intelligence could threaten traditional brokerage and valuation roles. While leaders insist that complex transactions still rely on human relationships and negotiation, AI‑related market jitters briefly pushed some CRE stocks down before they recovered.
