In the heated arena of the U.S. presidential race, Vice President Kamala Harris has been making waves with her pointed critiques of former President Donald Trump’s business history. During a rally in Charlotte, North Carolina, on September 12, Harris unveiled her proposal for a $50,000 tax deduction aimed at small business startups. She then took a direct jab at Trump, asserting, “You know, not everybody started out with $400m on a silver platter and then filed for bankruptcy six times.”
Harris’s remarks have sparked a flurry of fact-checking, with many turning to a recent article from Al Jazeera that delves into the veracity of these claims. The article references a comprehensive 2018 analysis by The New York Times, revealing that Trump did indeed receive approximately $413 million from his father, Fred Trump, over his lifetime. However, this sum was not a single lump sum at the start of his career but rather dispersed over many years.
During a recent debate, Trump countered Harris’s claims, stating, “I wasn’t given $400m. I wish I was. My father was a Brooklyn builder. Brooklyn, Queens. And a great father, and I learned a lot from him. But I was given a fraction of that, a tiny fraction, and I built it into many, many billions of dollars.” The debate further intensified when Harris reiterated her points in a conversation hosted by Oprah Winfrey.
The Al Jazeera article also examines the claim of Trump’s six bankruptcies, confirming its accuracy. Trump’s financial struggles included high-profile bankruptcies such as the Trump Taj Mahal casino in 1991 and Trump Entertainment Resorts in 2009, among others. Experts have noted that while Trump did experience these financial setbacks, they are not uncommon in the business world.
Our Ruling
While Harris’s statement about Trump’s business beginnings contains elements of truth, it omits significant details. The New York Times investigation clarifies that Trump did not start his business career with $400 million readily available. Instead, he had the prospect of inheriting a portion of his father’s substantial real estate empire. This nuanced reality leads us to rate Harris’s statement as Half True.
Conclusion
As the presidential race progresses, the scrutiny of candidates’ claims remains crucial. Harris’s comments highlight the ongoing debate about wealth and privilege in America, while Trump’s rebuttal underscores the complexities of his business legacy. The full story, as always, is layered and multifaceted.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
After years of sluggish commercial real estate performance, falling interest rates may finally set the stage for a market rebound. As the Federal Reserve signals further cuts, investors are eyeing REITs—and especially the Direxion Real Estate Bull 3X ETF (DRN), a leveraged fund designed to triple the daily movement of major commercial real estate stocks. DRN offers powerful upside potential during a rally, but its high‑risk, short‑term nature means it’s best suited for experienced traders who understand volatility and the mechanics of leverage.
A new proposal in Florida’s legislature could reshape the path to homeownership for working residents. House Bill 311, championed by State Rep. Jervonte Edmonds, would require certain private employers to contribute up to $5,000 toward their first-time homebuyer employees’ down payments or closing costs. Backed by bipartisan support, the bill ties employer tax write-offs directly to helping workers purchase homes, marking a unique approach to housing affordability. Now moving through committee, HB 311 could become one of the nation’s most innovative employer-assisted housing programs.
Artificial intelligence is pushing the real estate industry to confront a long‑standing problem: its data is fragmented, inconsistent, and nearly impossible for AI systems to interpret. From leases and rent rolls to county records and work orders, nothing is standardized, making AI adoption costly and inefficient. Industry leaders are now turning toward shared data standards and ontologies—like OSCRE’s “smart data highway”—to create cleaner, interoperable information systems. As real estate evolves, professionals who understand data and AI will have a major advantage, and schools like Cameron Academy are helping prepare them for this shift.
The U.S. housing market stumbled into 2026 as January home sales tumbled 8.4% from December, hitting their lowest pace in over a year. With inventory still tight, prices rising, and market activity stagnating, NAR’s chief economist warns that Americans—especially renters—are “stuck” in a new kind of housing crisis. Despite improving affordability on paper, sluggish movement and regional declines signal a market demanding sharper strategy and adaptability from today’s real estate professionals.
A fresh 2026 analysis reveals the top home insurance companies in the U.S., breaking down which carriers offer the best value, coverage options, and customer satisfaction. State Farm leads for customer experience, American Family shines for first-time buyers, and Allstate, Farmers, and Nationwide each earn top marks in specialized categories. With Florida’s premiums surging to more than double the national average, industry pros and homeowners alike gain a clear advantage by understanding which insurers remain strong—especially as weather risks, insurer withdrawals, and rising reconstruction costs reshape the market.
A new Perryman Group analysis shows Florida’s 2022–2023 insurance reforms are paying off, lowering property‑casualty costs by 14.5% and generating more than $4.2 billion in economic activity. With over 29,000 jobs created and premium increases nearly flat in 2025, the state’s long‑troubled insurance market is finally stabilizing as major carriers reduce rates and return to the market.
