In the heated arena of the U.S. presidential race, Vice President Kamala Harris has been making waves with her pointed critiques of former President Donald Trump’s business history. During a rally in Charlotte, North Carolina, on September 12, Harris unveiled her proposal for a $50,000 tax deduction aimed at small business startups. She then took a direct jab at Trump, asserting, “You know, not everybody started out with $400m on a silver platter and then filed for bankruptcy six times.”
Harris’s remarks have sparked a flurry of fact-checking, with many turning to a recent article from Al Jazeera that delves into the veracity of these claims. The article references a comprehensive 2018 analysis by The New York Times, revealing that Trump did indeed receive approximately $413 million from his father, Fred Trump, over his lifetime. However, this sum was not a single lump sum at the start of his career but rather dispersed over many years.
During a recent debate, Trump countered Harris’s claims, stating, “I wasn’t given $400m. I wish I was. My father was a Brooklyn builder. Brooklyn, Queens. And a great father, and I learned a lot from him. But I was given a fraction of that, a tiny fraction, and I built it into many, many billions of dollars.” The debate further intensified when Harris reiterated her points in a conversation hosted by Oprah Winfrey.
The Al Jazeera article also examines the claim of Trump’s six bankruptcies, confirming its accuracy. Trump’s financial struggles included high-profile bankruptcies such as the Trump Taj Mahal casino in 1991 and Trump Entertainment Resorts in 2009, among others. Experts have noted that while Trump did experience these financial setbacks, they are not uncommon in the business world.
Our Ruling
While Harris’s statement about Trump’s business beginnings contains elements of truth, it omits significant details. The New York Times investigation clarifies that Trump did not start his business career with $400 million readily available. Instead, he had the prospect of inheriting a portion of his father’s substantial real estate empire. This nuanced reality leads us to rate Harris’s statement as Half True.
Conclusion
As the presidential race progresses, the scrutiny of candidates’ claims remains crucial. Harris’s comments highlight the ongoing debate about wealth and privilege in America, while Trump’s rebuttal underscores the complexities of his business legacy. The full story, as always, is layered and multifaceted.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Lower interest rates, improving buyer confidence, and a resilient job market are setting the stage for a stronger South Florida real estate landscape in 2026. After a steadier‑than‑expected 2025, single‑family homes remain competitive, condos are stabilizing despite regulatory pressures, and commercial real estate continues to outperform national trends — giving industry professionals plenty to watch in the year ahead.
Economists across the housing industry are signaling that 2026 may finally bring a true market rebalance. With mortgage rates expected to ease, inventory slowly expanding and affordability showing its first real improvement in years, home sales could climb by 14% nationwide. Prices are projected to rise only modestly, builders are ramping up cautiously and shifting demographics are reshaping who’s buying—and what they’re looking for. For real estate and finance professionals, this more active and balanced landscape sets the stage for a strong year of opportunity.
South Florida enters 2026 with renewed confidence as easing mortgage rates, a solid job market, and stabilizing housing trends breathe life back into both single‑family and condo sectors. After an uneven 2025 marked by high costs and condo‑related challenges, lower borrowing rates are drawing buyers back, encouraging more homeowners to list, and positioning the region for a more balanced — though still competitive — year ahead.
The U.S. real estate landscape is entering a defining year, driven by AI innovation, reimagined office spaces, immersive retail, and resilient industrial growth. Investors are becoming more selective, while ESG expectations are solidifying into essential standards for value and tenant demand. For professionals looking to stay competitive in 2026, understanding these shifts—and upskilling accordingly—will be key to navigating an industry rapidly transforming in real time.
Conforming mortgage credit has dropped to its lowest level since the MBA began tracking it in 2011, signaling a major tightening in loan options as 2026 begins. December’s Mortgage Credit Availability Index fell 2.6%, driven by shrinking ARM offerings, fewer cash‑out refi programs, and stricter documentation requirements. With conforming loans seeing the sharpest decline—down 3.8%—both buyers and mortgage professionals face a more challenging lending landscape that demands stronger financial profiles and up‑to‑date industry knowledge.
A new NAR outlook shows that first-time buyers may finally be gaining traction in 2026 as rising inventory, easing rates, and creative financing strategies open long-awaited pathways into homeownership. From ARMs and government-backed loans to family support, grants, and co-buying, younger buyers are finding new ways to “make the math work.” Builders are also stepping in with incentives and expanded townhome construction, signaling a slow but meaningful shift toward improved affordability.
