In the heated arena of the U.S. presidential race, Vice President Kamala Harris has been making waves with her pointed critiques of former President Donald Trump’s business history. During a rally in Charlotte, North Carolina, on September 12, Harris unveiled her proposal for a $50,000 tax deduction aimed at small business startups. She then took a direct jab at Trump, asserting, “You know, not everybody started out with $400m on a silver platter and then filed for bankruptcy six times.”
Harris’s remarks have sparked a flurry of fact-checking, with many turning to a recent article from Al Jazeera that delves into the veracity of these claims. The article references a comprehensive 2018 analysis by The New York Times, revealing that Trump did indeed receive approximately $413 million from his father, Fred Trump, over his lifetime. However, this sum was not a single lump sum at the start of his career but rather dispersed over many years.
During a recent debate, Trump countered Harris’s claims, stating, “I wasn’t given $400m. I wish I was. My father was a Brooklyn builder. Brooklyn, Queens. And a great father, and I learned a lot from him. But I was given a fraction of that, a tiny fraction, and I built it into many, many billions of dollars.” The debate further intensified when Harris reiterated her points in a conversation hosted by Oprah Winfrey.
The Al Jazeera article also examines the claim of Trump’s six bankruptcies, confirming its accuracy. Trump’s financial struggles included high-profile bankruptcies such as the Trump Taj Mahal casino in 1991 and Trump Entertainment Resorts in 2009, among others. Experts have noted that while Trump did experience these financial setbacks, they are not uncommon in the business world.
Our Ruling
While Harris’s statement about Trump’s business beginnings contains elements of truth, it omits significant details. The New York Times investigation clarifies that Trump did not start his business career with $400 million readily available. Instead, he had the prospect of inheriting a portion of his father’s substantial real estate empire. This nuanced reality leads us to rate Harris’s statement as Half True.
Conclusion
As the presidential race progresses, the scrutiny of candidates’ claims remains crucial. Harris’s comments highlight the ongoing debate about wealth and privilege in America, while Trump’s rebuttal underscores the complexities of his business legacy. The full story, as always, is layered and multifaceted.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
The greenhouse industry is entering 2026 with a complex wave of overlapping risks — from rising insurance costs and extreme weather to cyber threats, labor shortages, and unstable supply chains. These challenges aren’t isolated; they compound one another, increasing pressure on growers and business owners alike. Insights from industry experts reveal the key trends shaping risk management in the year ahead and what operators must do now to stay resilient.
New FDIC reporting rules are changing how banks classify and disclose commercial real estate loans, replacing the old Troubled Debt Restructuring label with clearer “financial difficulty” modifications and expanding transparency across structured products and capital requirements. These updates may briefly tighten lending but ultimately promise stronger liquidity, cleaner risk data, and more predictable CRE financing as banks adapt.
Artificial intelligence is no longer an upcoming trend—it's already reshaping how real estate professionals work, compete, and win. With the AI real estate sector set to surge from $222B in 2024 to nearly $1T by 2029, the industry is undergoing a rapid transformation in valuations, virtual tours, listings, investment analysis, and client management. Agents and investors who embrace AI tools are gaining unprecedented efficiency and insight, while those who resist risk falling behind.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency is weighing the idea of 50‑year mortgages, a move that could make monthly payments more affordable but dramatically increase total interest costs. Supporters say it may help young professionals break into the housing market, while critics warn it could trap families in half a century of debt. As the industry debates this controversial loan option, real estate and mortgage professionals must stay informed to guide clients through the shifting landscape.
December is shaping up to be another unpredictable month for mortgage rates. With the Federal Reserve signaling mixed messages, key economic reports running behind schedule, and lenders already looking ahead to 2026, rates could face upward pressure. Experts from Fannie Mae and the MBA project an average 30‑year rate around 6.3% for late 2025, suggesting a potential December bump. For real estate and mortgage professionals, understanding this volatility isn’t just helpful — it’s a competitive edge.
Sellers are cutting prices at record levels, delistings are surging to highs not seen since 2017, and buyers remain hesitant despite slightly lower mortgage rates. With affordability still strained and new construction slowing, the 2025 housing market is entering a deeper‑than‑usual winter slowdown marked by caution on all sides.
