In the heated arena of the U.S. presidential race, Vice President Kamala Harris has been making waves with her pointed critiques of former President Donald Trump’s business history. During a rally in Charlotte, North Carolina, on September 12, Harris unveiled her proposal for a $50,000 tax deduction aimed at small business startups. She then took a direct jab at Trump, asserting, “You know, not everybody started out with $400m on a silver platter and then filed for bankruptcy six times.”
Harris’s remarks have sparked a flurry of fact-checking, with many turning to a recent article from Al Jazeera that delves into the veracity of these claims. The article references a comprehensive 2018 analysis by The New York Times, revealing that Trump did indeed receive approximately $413 million from his father, Fred Trump, over his lifetime. However, this sum was not a single lump sum at the start of his career but rather dispersed over many years.
During a recent debate, Trump countered Harris’s claims, stating, “I wasn’t given $400m. I wish I was. My father was a Brooklyn builder. Brooklyn, Queens. And a great father, and I learned a lot from him. But I was given a fraction of that, a tiny fraction, and I built it into many, many billions of dollars.” The debate further intensified when Harris reiterated her points in a conversation hosted by Oprah Winfrey.
The Al Jazeera article also examines the claim of Trump’s six bankruptcies, confirming its accuracy. Trump’s financial struggles included high-profile bankruptcies such as the Trump Taj Mahal casino in 1991 and Trump Entertainment Resorts in 2009, among others. Experts have noted that while Trump did experience these financial setbacks, they are not uncommon in the business world.
Our Ruling
While Harris’s statement about Trump’s business beginnings contains elements of truth, it omits significant details. The New York Times investigation clarifies that Trump did not start his business career with $400 million readily available. Instead, he had the prospect of inheriting a portion of his father’s substantial real estate empire. This nuanced reality leads us to rate Harris’s statement as Half True.
Conclusion
As the presidential race progresses, the scrutiny of candidates’ claims remains crucial. Harris’s comments highlight the ongoing debate about wealth and privilege in America, while Trump’s rebuttal underscores the complexities of his business legacy. The full story, as always, is layered and multifaceted.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
The commercial real estate sector closed out 2025 with renewed stability, as the Real Estate Roundtable’s latest sentiment index shows rising confidence and improving market fundamentals. Executives report better access to capital, stronger performance in residential, retail, and hospitality, and early signs of recovery in the office market. With financing loosening and asset values climbing, the outlook for 2026 is increasingly optimistic, creating fresh opportunities for both seasoned professionals and newcomers preparing to enter the field.
The CFPB is proposing changes to how lenders evaluate “disparate impact” under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, potentially tightening the scrutiny on credit decisions that unintentionally disadvantage protected groups. These updates could reshape underwriting models, lending criteria, and compliance requirements — ultimately influencing mortgage approvals, buyer qualifications, and day‑to‑day real estate activity.
Florida’s insurance crisis has become the defining issue heading into 2026, with Republicans touting recent market improvements while Democrats argue families are still being crushed by soaring premiums. From billion‑dollar auto insurance refunds to condo markets destabilized by post‑Surfside rate spikes, the state’s political divide is shaping the future of real estate, insurance, and affordability for millions.
October 2025 brought a wave of major regulatory updates across insurance, finance, and compliance. From stricter oversight on retail insurers and new FCA rules on ESG and travel insurance, to EIOPA’s EU‑wide consultations and refreshed corporate governance standards, regulators signaled higher expectations and faster change ahead. For professionals—and those pursuing licenses—these shifts directly impact risk management, product design, and consumer outcomes, making regulatory awareness a critical competitive advantage.
After nearly two years of sluggish activity, commercial real estate lending is finally accelerating—fast. New data from CBRE shows loan closings jumped 112% year‑over‑year in Q3 2025, reaching their highest level since 2018. With interest rates stabilizing and credit spreads tightening, investors are returning, banks are re‑entering the market, and multifamily financing is dominating once again. The long‑stalled deal flow is thawing, signaling renewed momentum heading into 2026.
Farmers Insurance is lifting its cap on new homeowner policies in California after two years of limiting growth, signaling a shift in the state’s strained insurance market. The expansion comes with a proposed 6.99 percent rate increase that still needs regulatory approval. Supporters call it a turning point driven by new wildfire‑risk rules, while consumer advocates warn the reforms contain loopholes and could lead to higher costs for homeowners.
