In the heated arena of the U.S. presidential race, Vice President Kamala Harris has been making waves with her pointed critiques of former President Donald Trump’s business history. During a rally in Charlotte, North Carolina, on September 12, Harris unveiled her proposal for a $50,000 tax deduction aimed at small business startups. She then took a direct jab at Trump, asserting, “You know, not everybody started out with $400m on a silver platter and then filed for bankruptcy six times.”
Harris’s remarks have sparked a flurry of fact-checking, with many turning to a recent article from Al Jazeera that delves into the veracity of these claims. The article references a comprehensive 2018 analysis by The New York Times, revealing that Trump did indeed receive approximately $413 million from his father, Fred Trump, over his lifetime. However, this sum was not a single lump sum at the start of his career but rather dispersed over many years.
During a recent debate, Trump countered Harris’s claims, stating, “I wasn’t given $400m. I wish I was. My father was a Brooklyn builder. Brooklyn, Queens. And a great father, and I learned a lot from him. But I was given a fraction of that, a tiny fraction, and I built it into many, many billions of dollars.” The debate further intensified when Harris reiterated her points in a conversation hosted by Oprah Winfrey.
The Al Jazeera article also examines the claim of Trump’s six bankruptcies, confirming its accuracy. Trump’s financial struggles included high-profile bankruptcies such as the Trump Taj Mahal casino in 1991 and Trump Entertainment Resorts in 2009, among others. Experts have noted that while Trump did experience these financial setbacks, they are not uncommon in the business world.
Our Ruling
While Harris’s statement about Trump’s business beginnings contains elements of truth, it omits significant details. The New York Times investigation clarifies that Trump did not start his business career with $400 million readily available. Instead, he had the prospect of inheriting a portion of his father’s substantial real estate empire. This nuanced reality leads us to rate Harris’s statement as Half True.
Conclusion
As the presidential race progresses, the scrutiny of candidates’ claims remains crucial. Harris’s comments highlight the ongoing debate about wealth and privilege in America, while Trump’s rebuttal underscores the complexities of his business legacy. The full story, as always, is layered and multifaceted.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Los Alamitos Race Course is facing its most serious crisis in years after 18 horses died in 2025, prompting regulators to warn the track that its racing license is at risk without immediate safety reforms. Following three catastrophic injuries in a single day, the California Horse Racing Board has ordered urgent changes—including more veterinarians, stricter medication rules, and enhanced on‑track medical support—as pressure mounts for stronger oversight in a sport already under national scrutiny.
Canadian investors have poured more than US$5.8 billion into U.S. commercial real estate this year, making the U.S. their top destination even amid a lingering tariff dispute. Tight inventory in Canada and greater deal availability south of the border are driving the trend, with data centers and industrial properties emerging as the hottest targets for 2025.
Florida’s insurance commissioner says even industry pros struggle to read today’s 150‑page homeowners policies—leaving residents shocked when hurricane claims are denied. With rising premiums, high replacement costs, and widespread confusion over exclusions like flood and water damage, the state is pushing for simpler, clearer policy language so homeowners know what they’re actually covered for before the next storm hits.
Following the 2025 elections, major metros like New York, Chicago, Miami, Los Angeles, and Boston are implementing policy shifts that could reshape property values, rental income, development timelines, and investment strategy heading into 2026. From New York’s push toward aggressive rent reform to Chicago’s sustainability mandates and Miami’s uncertain mayoral runoff, these changes signal a new era where local politics increasingly dictate market performance. This breakdown highlights the biggest post‑election real estate pivots and what they mean for investors, agents, and finance professionals preparing for a rapidly evolving landscape.
Florida’s Insurance Commissioner is sounding the alarm after thousands of homeowners discovered—only after hurricanes Helene and Milton—that the coverage they thought they had didn’t exist. With nearly 150,000 unpaid claims tied to misunderstood flood exclusions, water‑damage caps, and buried policy clauses, state leaders are pushing to simplify the dense, confusing documents most Floridians never read. As insurance costs remain one of the state’s top concerns, this growing complexity is creating a massive opportunity for real estate, mortgage, and insurance professionals to guide consumers before disaster strikes.
Florida’s insurance market is reliving an old crisis under a new name. Despite reforms meant to stabilize the system, homeowners are being forced out of Citizens and into pricier policies from small insurers with shaky financial histories. Companies tied to past insolvencies are returning with fresh branding, while highly rated carriers continue to deny a majority of claims. With political influence muddying regulation and climate risks rising, experts warn that only a full structural overhaul—not cosmetic reforms—can restore confidence for homeowners, agents, and the entire real estate market.
