In the heated arena of the U.S. presidential race, Vice President Kamala Harris has been making waves with her pointed critiques of former President Donald Trump’s business history. During a rally in Charlotte, North Carolina, on September 12, Harris unveiled her proposal for a $50,000 tax deduction aimed at small business startups. She then took a direct jab at Trump, asserting, “You know, not everybody started out with $400m on a silver platter and then filed for bankruptcy six times.”
Harris’s remarks have sparked a flurry of fact-checking, with many turning to a recent article from Al Jazeera that delves into the veracity of these claims. The article references a comprehensive 2018 analysis by The New York Times, revealing that Trump did indeed receive approximately $413 million from his father, Fred Trump, over his lifetime. However, this sum was not a single lump sum at the start of his career but rather dispersed over many years.
During a recent debate, Trump countered Harris’s claims, stating, “I wasn’t given $400m. I wish I was. My father was a Brooklyn builder. Brooklyn, Queens. And a great father, and I learned a lot from him. But I was given a fraction of that, a tiny fraction, and I built it into many, many billions of dollars.” The debate further intensified when Harris reiterated her points in a conversation hosted by Oprah Winfrey.
The Al Jazeera article also examines the claim of Trump’s six bankruptcies, confirming its accuracy. Trump’s financial struggles included high-profile bankruptcies such as the Trump Taj Mahal casino in 1991 and Trump Entertainment Resorts in 2009, among others. Experts have noted that while Trump did experience these financial setbacks, they are not uncommon in the business world.
Our Ruling
While Harris’s statement about Trump’s business beginnings contains elements of truth, it omits significant details. The New York Times investigation clarifies that Trump did not start his business career with $400 million readily available. Instead, he had the prospect of inheriting a portion of his father’s substantial real estate empire. This nuanced reality leads us to rate Harris’s statement as Half True.
Conclusion
As the presidential race progresses, the scrutiny of candidates’ claims remains crucial. Harris’s comments highlight the ongoing debate about wealth and privilege in America, while Trump’s rebuttal underscores the complexities of his business legacy. The full story, as always, is layered and multifaceted.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Cybercrime in 2025 has evolved into a full‑scale service economy, with malware now available through subscription platforms that operate like mainstream tech businesses. Bitsight’s latest analysis reveals explosive growth in Malware‑as‑a‑Service tools, rising attacks across industries like healthcare, finance, tech, and real estate, and a surge in cross‑platform malware and supply‑chain exploits. For professionals in any licensed field, the message is clear: today’s digital landscape demands heightened vigilance, stronger identity security, and proactive defense against an increasingly organized underground threat environment.
A new proptech startup in the UAE, Gllit is redefining how property deals happen by removing agents, eliminating commissions, and integrating AI tools that let users create professional listings in seconds. With a fast, transparent, and direct-to-owner model, Gllit offers a glimpse into the future of global real estate — and a powerful case study for U.S. professionals preparing for tech-driven changes in the industry.
The 2026 housing market is shaping up to be a year of stability with a few surprises. Mortgage rates are expected to hold steady, home price growth is slowing, and yet ownership costs continue to rise due to soaring taxes and insurance. Meanwhile, renting is becoming more attractive as affordability improves and built‑to‑rent communities expand. This breakdown highlights the biggest trends ahead — and what they mean for buyers, sellers, and real estate professionals, especially in Florida.
Florida homeowners are facing some of the highest insurance premiums in the nation, with average costs now topping $5,800 per year—about $3,000 above the U.S. average. Many residents report their rates have doubled or even tripled, while more than 40 percent of claims are closed with no payment. As frustration grows, state lawmakers and consumer advocates are pushing for transparency, rate caps, and incentives to help storm‑proof homes. The outcome of these reform efforts could reshape Florida’s real estate market, insurance landscape, and affordability for years to come.
A new global study from Risk.net and SAS reveals that many insurance companies are still making key decisions in isolated silos, despite industry-wide pushes toward data-driven strategies. While most leaders claim to have a clear vision, 38 percent admit they lack a real-time view of risks, revenue and costs. With poor data quality, limited collaboration and outdated processes holding teams back, experts say the industry is poised for a major transformation through AI, analytics and unified strategy—offering lessons for professionals across insurance, real estate, finance and other regulated fields.
Atlanta’s housing market is shifting into a more balanced and predictable phase. Prices have leveled off, inventory has finally caught up, and mortgage rates are easing enough to bring buyers back into the game. With steady demand, growing listings, and only mild price corrections forecasted into 2026, Atlanta remains one of the Southeast’s strongest real estate markets for buyers, sellers, and investors alike.
