As the clock ticks toward a December 31 deadline, a major House subcommittee is considering 15 bills aimed at expanding access to telehealth services. This legislative push is crucial as pandemic-era flexibilities face expiration, potentially affecting countless patients who have come to rely on virtual care.
The American Telemedicine Association has dubbed 2024 the “Super Bowl” of telehealth regulation, advocating for the permanent establishment of Medicare flexibilities introduced during COVID-19. According to FierceHealthcare, this regulatory showdown is critical for the future of telehealth.
The Push for Permanency
Healthcare systems and providers are urging lawmakers to secure permanent Medicare coverage for telehealth services. The absence of legislative action could result in a significant loss of access, particularly for vulnerable populations. Lee Schwamm, M.D., from Yale New Haven Health System, emphasized the need for permanent solutions, stating that telehealth allows for patient-centered care, especially when in-person visits pose challenges.
Prior to the pandemic, telehealth was often a cash-only service, inaccessible to many. However, the integration of virtual and in-person care has become a new standard, as highlighted by Eve Cunningham, M.D., from Providence health system. Telehealth now represents about 20% of ambulatory care visits at Providence, and its services extend to rural and underserved urban areas.
Legislative Proposals
Two significant bills, the CONNECT for Health Act and the Telehealth Modernization Act, aim to solidify telehealth flexibilities. These proposals seek to remove geographic restrictions, expand provider eligibility, and extend audio-only telehealth coverage. The American Hospital Association supports these measures, citing telehealth’s potential to address clinician shortages and enhance patient care.
Debate Over Costs and Quality
While telehealth has shown promise in improving chronic disease management and reducing emergency visits, concerns about increased healthcare spending remain. A previous extension was estimated to raise Medicare costs by over $2 billion. However, experts like Ateev Mehrotra, M.D., argue that the value of telehealth should guide policy decisions, despite modest spending increases.
Payment parity is another contentious issue. Some advocate for lower reimbursement rates for telehealth, while others, like Schwamm, caution against significant pay cuts that could discourage virtual care. The ongoing debate highlights the need for a balanced approach to telehealth reimbursement.
Fred Riccardi from the Medicare Rights Center urged for greater oversight before expanding Medicare coverage for telehealth. The organization emphasizes policies that increase access, promote health equity, and ensure high-quality care.
Conclusion
As lawmakers deliberate these legislative moves, the future of telehealth hangs in the balance. The decisions made in the coming months will shape the landscape of healthcare delivery, determining whether telehealth remains a core function or reverts to a limited service.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
A federal judge has denied class‑certification in the high‑stakes Batton commission lawsuit, delivering a temporary win for NAR and major brokerages while leaving the door open for plaintiffs to try again. With as much as $3.6 billion in potential damages on the line and nearly 80% of the proposed class now disqualified due to conflicts with earlier settlements, the case stands at a pivotal moment. Real estate professionals nationwide — especially in Florida — should watch closely, as the ruling could shape the future of buyer‑agent compensation.
Florida homeowners are paying nearly double the national average for insurance, with premiums now reaching $5,838 a year and denied claims topping 40 percent. Residents report tripled rates, underpaid claims, and mounting financial strain, pushing lawmakers in Tallahassee to propose caps on rate hikes, tax breaks for storm‑proof upgrades, and tighter oversight of insurers. These developments are reshaping real estate and insurance conversations across the state as professionals brace for major industry shifts.
Berkshire County closed Q3 2025 with strong momentum as sales, dollar volume, and buyer competition all climbed year‑over‑year. Inventory showed slight improvement but remains far below demand, keeping the market tilted toward sellers. Single‑family homes and condos led the surge, while multifamily, land, and commercial sectors showed mixed performance. The region continues to stand out as one of New England’s most resilient real estate markets heading into 2026.
Florida homeowners now face the highest insurance burdens in the nation, with average premiums topping $5,800 per year—roughly $3,000 above the national average. As rates triple for some residents, more Floridians are skipping coverage altogether, while denied claims and slow payouts add to the frustration. With over 40 percent of claims closing with no payment and lawmakers battling over reform in Tallahassee, the crisis is reshaping budgets, homebuying decisions, and the real estate industry statewide.
Global capital is surging back into real estate—and this time, investors want more control. Colliers’ 2026 Global Investor Outlook reveals a major shift toward direct investments, joint ventures, and hands‑on strategies as money moves across North America, Europe, and the booming Asia‑Pacific markets. Data centers are now the top‑funded asset class, offices are staging a comeback, and adaptive reuse is reshaping cities worldwide. For real estate and finance professionals, the message is clear: opportunity is accelerating, and those with the right education and licensing will be at the center of the action.
The Fed’s recent rate cuts should have offered relief to commercial real estate—but long-term borrowing costs haven’t budged. While short‑term rates are falling, stubborn long‑term yields, broken deal math, and a trillion‑dollar refinancing wave are keeping the market frozen. For investors and professionals across Florida and the nation, understanding this disconnect is key to navigating the opportunities and risks emerging in today’s shifting CRE landscape.
