As the clock ticks toward a December 31 deadline, a major House subcommittee is considering 15 bills aimed at expanding access to telehealth services. This legislative push is crucial as pandemic-era flexibilities face expiration, potentially affecting countless patients who have come to rely on virtual care.
The American Telemedicine Association has dubbed 2024 the “Super Bowl” of telehealth regulation, advocating for the permanent establishment of Medicare flexibilities introduced during COVID-19. According to FierceHealthcare, this regulatory showdown is critical for the future of telehealth.
The Push for Permanency
Healthcare systems and providers are urging lawmakers to secure permanent Medicare coverage for telehealth services. The absence of legislative action could result in a significant loss of access, particularly for vulnerable populations. Lee Schwamm, M.D., from Yale New Haven Health System, emphasized the need for permanent solutions, stating that telehealth allows for patient-centered care, especially when in-person visits pose challenges.
Prior to the pandemic, telehealth was often a cash-only service, inaccessible to many. However, the integration of virtual and in-person care has become a new standard, as highlighted by Eve Cunningham, M.D., from Providence health system. Telehealth now represents about 20% of ambulatory care visits at Providence, and its services extend to rural and underserved urban areas.
Legislative Proposals
Two significant bills, the CONNECT for Health Act and the Telehealth Modernization Act, aim to solidify telehealth flexibilities. These proposals seek to remove geographic restrictions, expand provider eligibility, and extend audio-only telehealth coverage. The American Hospital Association supports these measures, citing telehealth’s potential to address clinician shortages and enhance patient care.
Debate Over Costs and Quality
While telehealth has shown promise in improving chronic disease management and reducing emergency visits, concerns about increased healthcare spending remain. A previous extension was estimated to raise Medicare costs by over $2 billion. However, experts like Ateev Mehrotra, M.D., argue that the value of telehealth should guide policy decisions, despite modest spending increases.
Payment parity is another contentious issue. Some advocate for lower reimbursement rates for telehealth, while others, like Schwamm, caution against significant pay cuts that could discourage virtual care. The ongoing debate highlights the need for a balanced approach to telehealth reimbursement.
Fred Riccardi from the Medicare Rights Center urged for greater oversight before expanding Medicare coverage for telehealth. The organization emphasizes policies that increase access, promote health equity, and ensure high-quality care.
Conclusion
As lawmakers deliberate these legislative moves, the future of telehealth hangs in the balance. The decisions made in the coming months will shape the landscape of healthcare delivery, determining whether telehealth remains a core function or reverts to a limited service.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
A surge in home insurance premiums is reshaping housing markets across the country, hitting disaster‑prone regions the hardest. From Louisiana to Colorado and California, deals are collapsing, buyers are backing out, and home values are dropping as insurance becomes a central affordability hurdle. New data shows climate‑driven risk repricing and soaring reinsurance costs are stripping tens of thousands of dollars from property values, forcing some homeowners to sell at a loss—or go uninsured altogether.
After years of sluggish activity, the National Association of REALTORS predicts 2026 could mark the long‑awaited rebound for the housing market. With a projected 14% jump in home sales, steadier rates near 6%, and rising buyer activity, NAR economists say momentum is already building. Early signs—like a 31% surge in mortgage applications, continued job growth, and stabilizing prices—suggest a stronger, more confident market ahead, creating fresh opportunities for both seasoned professionals and aspiring agents preparing to enter the field.
A surge of global capital is reshaping real estate heading into 2026, with investors shifting toward hands‑on strategies, cross‑border diversification, and high‑growth asset classes like data centers. Colliers’ 2026 Global Investor Outlook highlights rising confidence, improving liquidity, and a major pivot toward direct investing and value‑add opportunities. From office market rebounds to Asia Pacific’s rapid fundraising growth, the report outlines trends every real estate professional should understand as the industry enters a more dynamic, opportunity‑rich cycle.
Culver City just became the first place in California to legalize six‑story apartment buildings with only one staircase — a simple change that could reshape mid‑rise housing statewide. By freeing up as much as 7% more usable floor space, architects say single‑stair designs allow bigger units, more windows, and the kind of elegant layouts common in New York and Europe. If the city’s six‑year experiment succeeds, it may spark a broader rethinking of U.S. building codes and open the door to more flexible, affordable multifamily development across California.
Stratford homeowners are receiving their 2025 Notices of Assessment Change, marking the town’s first property revaluation since 2019. Officials emphasize that rising assessments do not equal higher tax bills, as a new mill rate won’t be set until spring 2026. Residents can challenge or review their updated valuations through informal hearings hosted by Vision Government Solutions, with appointments available for one week after receiving a notice.
New reporting reveals Florida homeowners now face an average insurance premium of $5,838 per year — nearly triple the national average. With skyrocketing rates, denied claims, and mounting non-renewals, residents are being pushed to tough financial decisions while lawmakers scramble to implement reforms. From retirees skipping coverage to families battling insurers for fair payouts, Florida’s insurance crisis is reshaping both the housing market and the daily lives of homeowners statewide.
