As the clock ticks toward a December 31 deadline, a major House subcommittee is considering 15 bills aimed at expanding access to telehealth services. This legislative push is crucial as pandemic-era flexibilities face expiration, potentially affecting countless patients who have come to rely on virtual care.
The American Telemedicine Association has dubbed 2024 the “Super Bowl” of telehealth regulation, advocating for the permanent establishment of Medicare flexibilities introduced during COVID-19. According to FierceHealthcare, this regulatory showdown is critical for the future of telehealth.
The Push for Permanency
Healthcare systems and providers are urging lawmakers to secure permanent Medicare coverage for telehealth services. The absence of legislative action could result in a significant loss of access, particularly for vulnerable populations. Lee Schwamm, M.D., from Yale New Haven Health System, emphasized the need for permanent solutions, stating that telehealth allows for patient-centered care, especially when in-person visits pose challenges.
Prior to the pandemic, telehealth was often a cash-only service, inaccessible to many. However, the integration of virtual and in-person care has become a new standard, as highlighted by Eve Cunningham, M.D., from Providence health system. Telehealth now represents about 20% of ambulatory care visits at Providence, and its services extend to rural and underserved urban areas.
Legislative Proposals
Two significant bills, the CONNECT for Health Act and the Telehealth Modernization Act, aim to solidify telehealth flexibilities. These proposals seek to remove geographic restrictions, expand provider eligibility, and extend audio-only telehealth coverage. The American Hospital Association supports these measures, citing telehealth’s potential to address clinician shortages and enhance patient care.
Debate Over Costs and Quality
While telehealth has shown promise in improving chronic disease management and reducing emergency visits, concerns about increased healthcare spending remain. A previous extension was estimated to raise Medicare costs by over $2 billion. However, experts like Ateev Mehrotra, M.D., argue that the value of telehealth should guide policy decisions, despite modest spending increases.
Payment parity is another contentious issue. Some advocate for lower reimbursement rates for telehealth, while others, like Schwamm, caution against significant pay cuts that could discourage virtual care. The ongoing debate highlights the need for a balanced approach to telehealth reimbursement.
Fred Riccardi from the Medicare Rights Center urged for greater oversight before expanding Medicare coverage for telehealth. The organization emphasizes policies that increase access, promote health equity, and ensure high-quality care.
Conclusion
As lawmakers deliberate these legislative moves, the future of telehealth hangs in the balance. The decisions made in the coming months will shape the landscape of healthcare delivery, determining whether telehealth remains a core function or reverts to a limited service.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Los Alamitos Race Course is facing its most serious crisis in years after 18 horses died in 2025, prompting regulators to warn the track that its racing license is at risk without immediate safety reforms. Following three catastrophic injuries in a single day, the California Horse Racing Board has ordered urgent changes—including more veterinarians, stricter medication rules, and enhanced on‑track medical support—as pressure mounts for stronger oversight in a sport already under national scrutiny.
Canadian investors have poured more than US$5.8 billion into U.S. commercial real estate this year, making the U.S. their top destination even amid a lingering tariff dispute. Tight inventory in Canada and greater deal availability south of the border are driving the trend, with data centers and industrial properties emerging as the hottest targets for 2025.
Florida’s insurance commissioner says even industry pros struggle to read today’s 150‑page homeowners policies—leaving residents shocked when hurricane claims are denied. With rising premiums, high replacement costs, and widespread confusion over exclusions like flood and water damage, the state is pushing for simpler, clearer policy language so homeowners know what they’re actually covered for before the next storm hits.
Following the 2025 elections, major metros like New York, Chicago, Miami, Los Angeles, and Boston are implementing policy shifts that could reshape property values, rental income, development timelines, and investment strategy heading into 2026. From New York’s push toward aggressive rent reform to Chicago’s sustainability mandates and Miami’s uncertain mayoral runoff, these changes signal a new era where local politics increasingly dictate market performance. This breakdown highlights the biggest post‑election real estate pivots and what they mean for investors, agents, and finance professionals preparing for a rapidly evolving landscape.
Florida’s Insurance Commissioner is sounding the alarm after thousands of homeowners discovered—only after hurricanes Helene and Milton—that the coverage they thought they had didn’t exist. With nearly 150,000 unpaid claims tied to misunderstood flood exclusions, water‑damage caps, and buried policy clauses, state leaders are pushing to simplify the dense, confusing documents most Floridians never read. As insurance costs remain one of the state’s top concerns, this growing complexity is creating a massive opportunity for real estate, mortgage, and insurance professionals to guide consumers before disaster strikes.
Florida’s insurance market is reliving an old crisis under a new name. Despite reforms meant to stabilize the system, homeowners are being forced out of Citizens and into pricier policies from small insurers with shaky financial histories. Companies tied to past insolvencies are returning with fresh branding, while highly rated carriers continue to deny a majority of claims. With political influence muddying regulation and climate risks rising, experts warn that only a full structural overhaul—not cosmetic reforms—can restore confidence for homeowners, agents, and the entire real estate market.
