As the clock ticks toward a December 31 deadline, a major House subcommittee is considering 15 bills aimed at expanding access to telehealth services. This legislative push is crucial as pandemic-era flexibilities face expiration, potentially affecting countless patients who have come to rely on virtual care.
The American Telemedicine Association has dubbed 2024 the “Super Bowl” of telehealth regulation, advocating for the permanent establishment of Medicare flexibilities introduced during COVID-19. According to FierceHealthcare, this regulatory showdown is critical for the future of telehealth.
The Push for Permanency
Healthcare systems and providers are urging lawmakers to secure permanent Medicare coverage for telehealth services. The absence of legislative action could result in a significant loss of access, particularly for vulnerable populations. Lee Schwamm, M.D., from Yale New Haven Health System, emphasized the need for permanent solutions, stating that telehealth allows for patient-centered care, especially when in-person visits pose challenges.
Prior to the pandemic, telehealth was often a cash-only service, inaccessible to many. However, the integration of virtual and in-person care has become a new standard, as highlighted by Eve Cunningham, M.D., from Providence health system. Telehealth now represents about 20% of ambulatory care visits at Providence, and its services extend to rural and underserved urban areas.
Legislative Proposals
Two significant bills, the CONNECT for Health Act and the Telehealth Modernization Act, aim to solidify telehealth flexibilities. These proposals seek to remove geographic restrictions, expand provider eligibility, and extend audio-only telehealth coverage. The American Hospital Association supports these measures, citing telehealth’s potential to address clinician shortages and enhance patient care.
Debate Over Costs and Quality
While telehealth has shown promise in improving chronic disease management and reducing emergency visits, concerns about increased healthcare spending remain. A previous extension was estimated to raise Medicare costs by over $2 billion. However, experts like Ateev Mehrotra, M.D., argue that the value of telehealth should guide policy decisions, despite modest spending increases.
Payment parity is another contentious issue. Some advocate for lower reimbursement rates for telehealth, while others, like Schwamm, caution against significant pay cuts that could discourage virtual care. The ongoing debate highlights the need for a balanced approach to telehealth reimbursement.
Fred Riccardi from the Medicare Rights Center urged for greater oversight before expanding Medicare coverage for telehealth. The organization emphasizes policies that increase access, promote health equity, and ensure high-quality care.
Conclusion
As lawmakers deliberate these legislative moves, the future of telehealth hangs in the balance. The decisions made in the coming months will shape the landscape of healthcare delivery, determining whether telehealth remains a core function or reverts to a limited service.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Just 48 hours after NAR unveiled major revisions to its MLS policies, plaintiffs in the Michigan-based Hardy lawsuit moved to use those changes as evidence, arguing they prove NAR’s prior rules were anticompetitive. NAR denies any wrongdoing, but the case is quickly becoming a key test for whether MLS access should require Realtor membership — a question now echoing across multiple states and potentially reshaping how real estate professionals nationwide access the industry’s most essential tool.
Florida homeowners are now paying some of the highest insurance premiums in the country, with average costs topping $5,800 per year—nearly double the national average. Residents report skyrocketing rates, denied claims, and tough choices between costly coverage and financial risk. As frustration grows, lawmakers and consumer advocates are pushing new reforms aimed at increasing transparency, capping rate hikes, and protecting policyholders in one of the nation’s most volatile insurance markets.
Economic uncertainty, rapid AI adoption, tighter capital flows, and rising portfolio risk are reshaping the 2026 commercial real estate landscape. From shifting workforce patterns to a national housing attainability crisis, the industry is entering a data‑driven, fundamentals‑focused era—making adaptability, education, and tech literacy essential for real estate professionals.
Mortgage rates have climbed to 6.23 percent as investors grow doubtful that the Federal Reserve will deliver a rate cut in December. A soft but unclear jobs report and persistent inflation have pushed borrowing costs higher, reversing October’s brief relief in the housing market. Real estate and mortgage professionals should prepare clients for continued volatility as the Fed’s December meeting approaches.
After years of tight inventory, high mortgage rates, and sluggish sales, economists say 2026 is shaping up to be the turnaround real estate professionals have been waiting for. NAR projects a 14 percent jump in home sales, mortgage rates easing toward 6 percent, and buyer demand finally gaining momentum. While higher‑end homes are moving quickly, first‑time buyers continue to face affordability challenges, and price reductions are reappearing as sellers adjust to shifting conditions. For Florida agents, brokers, and newcomers, the stage is being set for a busy and opportunity‑rich year.
Florida’s average homeowner insurance premium has soared to $5,838 a year—almost $3,000 above the national average—pushing many residents to the financial brink. From tripled premiums to lowball claim payouts, homeowners are speaking out as frustration mounts. Some are even dropping coverage entirely. With more than 40% of claims closed without payment and policy cancellations at record levels, lawmakers are pushing for reforms, but political hurdles remain. The outcome could reshape Florida real estate, insurance, and mortgage markets for years to come.
