The history of standardized testing in the United States is steeped in controversy and criticism, particularly regarding its impact on students of color. From their inception over a century ago, these tests have been criticized as instruments of systemic racism and bias. As noted by the National Education Association, standardized tests have historically marginalized students of color, particularly those from low-income families.
Notably, educational researchers like Ibram X. Kendi have been vocal about the inherent biases in these assessments. Kendi, a prominent figure at the Antiracist Research & Policy Center, argues that standardized tests have been used as tools to degrade Black and Brown minds, excluding them from prestigious educational opportunities.
Historical Context
The origins of these tests can be traced back to the early 20th century, when figures like psychologist and eugenicist Carl Brigham played pivotal roles in their development. Brigham, who was instrumental in the creation of the SAT, believed in the superiority of certain races, a belief that influenced the design and implementation of these tests.
Shortly after the publication of “A Study of American Intelligence” in 1923, the College Board commissioned Carl Brigham to lead development of the SAT.
As the U.S. absorbed millions of immigrants, standardized tests were used to segregate and categorize students, often to their detriment. These biases have had lasting effects, contributing to educational disparities that persist today.
Modern Implications
Today, there is a growing movement to resist the overuse and misuse of standardized testing. Critics argue that these tests fail to accurately measure student learning and often exacerbate educational inequalities. Instead, there is a push for more authentic assessment methods that reflect a broader range of student skills and learning.
“The tests have failed time and again to achieve their intended purposes: measuring intelligence and predicting future academic and professional success. The tests, not the black test-takers, have been underachieving.” – Ibram X. Kendi
Efforts to reform these assessment systems are gaining traction, with educators and civil rights organizations advocating for changes that do not perpetuate racial and economic inequalities. As the National Education Association emphasizes, the focus should be on promoting assessments that support the academic, social, and emotional needs of students.
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Illinois kicked off the new year with more than 200 laws taking effect, impacting professionals across healthcare, insurance, real estate, education, and other regulated industries. From major healthcare coverage expansions to new AI hiring limits, enhanced worker protections, school safety reforms, and upgraded public‑safety standards, nearly every sector will see meaningful changes. As compliance expectations grow, institutions like Cameron Academy help professionals stay prepared and career‑ready in an evolving regulatory landscape.
As commercial real estate moves beyond two turbulent years, 2026 is emerging as a year of growth for professionals who know where to look. According to First American economist Xander Snyder, the biggest wins may come not from booming sectors but from distressed properties—especially those with short‑term issues that can recover with creative financing, recapitalization, or strategic repositioning. Multifamily distress, selective office restructuring, and the rise of non‑QM lending are setting the stage for brokers, investors, and new licensees to capitalize on flexible deal‑making and evolving market conditions.
Housing is taking over the national spotlight in 2026, with federal leaders, big‑city mayors, and market professionals all zeroing in on affordability, supply, and sweeping policy changes. From President Trump’s promised reform agenda to looming Section 8 funding risks and aggressive city‑level zoning overhauls, the year is shaping up to be one of the most consequential periods for real estate and related licensed professions. For agents, mortgage brokers, insurance specialists, and anyone tied to the housing ecosystem, rapid shifts in policy and market conditions make 2026 a year where preparation, education, and adaptability will be essential.
A lender wires $4.2 million after receiving what sounded like a routine call from a borrower’s attorney—same voice, same tone, same mannerisms. By morning, the truth emerges: the email was hacked, the phone call was an AI‑generated voice clone, and the money is gone. As scammers use AI to mimic voices, emails, and documents with startling accuracy, real estate finance has become a prime target. The industry’s growing reliance on AI brings efficiency, but also dangerous new vulnerabilities, pushing regulators, insurers, and professionals to rethink verification, security, and trust itself.
A new wave of migration is changing the shape of commercial real estate as Americans trade costly metros for more affordable, lifestyle-friendly regions. Smaller Southern and mid‑Atlantic markets are gaining momentum, while pandemic boom states like Florida, Texas, and Arizona are now leveling off. These shifts are influencing demand for housing, retail, office parks, warehouses, and even self‑storage, signaling both fresh opportunities and heightened caution for investors and real estate professionals.
Florida is gearing up for a potential overhaul of its property tax system, with lawmakers pushing proposals that could dramatically reduce or even eliminate property taxes by 2026. Homeowners facing rising bills welcome the idea, but city and county leaders warn it could cripple essential services like police, fire response, and local infrastructure. As political tensions escalate — including accusations of overspending and sharp pushback from local officials — real estate professionals should prepare for major market impacts if reforms move forward.
