The history of standardized testing in the United States is steeped in controversy and criticism, particularly regarding its impact on students of color. From their inception over a century ago, these tests have been criticized as instruments of systemic racism and bias. As noted by the National Education Association, standardized tests have historically marginalized students of color, particularly those from low-income families.
Notably, educational researchers like Ibram X. Kendi have been vocal about the inherent biases in these assessments. Kendi, a prominent figure at the Antiracist Research & Policy Center, argues that standardized tests have been used as tools to degrade Black and Brown minds, excluding them from prestigious educational opportunities.
Historical Context
The origins of these tests can be traced back to the early 20th century, when figures like psychologist and eugenicist Carl Brigham played pivotal roles in their development. Brigham, who was instrumental in the creation of the SAT, believed in the superiority of certain races, a belief that influenced the design and implementation of these tests.
Shortly after the publication of “A Study of American Intelligence” in 1923, the College Board commissioned Carl Brigham to lead development of the SAT.
As the U.S. absorbed millions of immigrants, standardized tests were used to segregate and categorize students, often to their detriment. These biases have had lasting effects, contributing to educational disparities that persist today.
Modern Implications
Today, there is a growing movement to resist the overuse and misuse of standardized testing. Critics argue that these tests fail to accurately measure student learning and often exacerbate educational inequalities. Instead, there is a push for more authentic assessment methods that reflect a broader range of student skills and learning.
“The tests have failed time and again to achieve their intended purposes: measuring intelligence and predicting future academic and professional success. The tests, not the black test-takers, have been underachieving.” – Ibram X. Kendi
Efforts to reform these assessment systems are gaining traction, with educators and civil rights organizations advocating for changes that do not perpetuate racial and economic inequalities. As the National Education Association emphasizes, the focus should be on promoting assessments that support the academic, social, and emotional needs of students.
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
New data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reveals major pay gaps across industries as we head into 2025. While top roles in finance, tech, and healthcare exceed $130,000 to $160,000 a year, other professions lag far behind—even when education levels are similar. Job titles, location, experience, and specialized skills are now some of the biggest factors shaping how much you earn. If you’ve been wondering whether your paycheck is keeping up with the market, this breakdown shows exactly where you stand and what it takes to boost your earning power.
A cooling housing market is giving buyers something they haven’t had in years: room to breathe. With slower sales, more inventory, and less pressure to make snap decisions, homebuyer regret has noticeably declined in 2025. Buyers are feeling more confident thanks to fewer bidding wars, reduced overpaying, and stronger financial preparation—though maintenance surprises still pose challenges. This shift toward a true buyer’s market offers real estate professionals a prime opportunity to guide clients with clarity and confidence.
This week’s commercial real estate roundup unpacks the lingering economic fallout from the 43‑day federal shutdown, new pressures on major office markets, and the rise of STEM‑driven cities reshaping demand nationwide. With fresh Q3 data from Altus showing stronger‑than‑expected transaction momentum, plus updates on Chicago’s valuation slide and national mortgage policy debates, this edition delivers the essential trends CRE, mortgage, finance, and appraisal professionals need to stay ahead.
ATTOM has been named Inman’s 2025 Best of Proptech winner, earning top recognition for its leadership in data and intelligence platforms. With advancements like Snowflake integration, ATTOM Nexus, and enhanced parcel‑centric analytics, the company is shaping the future of AI‑driven real estate decision‑making. This win highlights ATTOM’s growing role as a trusted data backbone for real estate, mortgage, insurance, and investment professionals nationwide.
A new report reveals that Florida’s property insurance market is far from recovering. Despite political claims of stabilization, homeowners are seeing premiums up 54% since 2019, widespread insurer instability, and some companies re‑entering the market under rebranded identities. With high rates of unpaid claims, delayed payouts, and policy non‑renewals, lawmakers are now pushing for transparency and oversight. For homeowners and industry professionals alike, understanding these risks is critical as Florida’s insurance challenges continue to deepen.
Despite new insurers entering the state and lawmakers touting market improvements, a new report reveals Florida’s property insurance system is still plagued by high premiums, weak oversight, and companies with troubled histories. Rates have climbed 54% since 2019, nearly one‑fifth of homeowners are now uninsured, and Florida leads the nation in unpaid and delayed claims. Critics warn that the state’s strategy of shifting risk to undercapitalized private companies may set the stage for another crisis — leaving homeowners, buyers, and real estate professionals navigating a market that’s far from stable.
