The history of standardized testing in the United States is steeped in controversy and criticism, particularly regarding its impact on students of color. From their inception over a century ago, these tests have been criticized as instruments of systemic racism and bias. As noted by the National Education Association, standardized tests have historically marginalized students of color, particularly those from low-income families.
Notably, educational researchers like Ibram X. Kendi have been vocal about the inherent biases in these assessments. Kendi, a prominent figure at the Antiracist Research & Policy Center, argues that standardized tests have been used as tools to degrade Black and Brown minds, excluding them from prestigious educational opportunities.
Historical Context
The origins of these tests can be traced back to the early 20th century, when figures like psychologist and eugenicist Carl Brigham played pivotal roles in their development. Brigham, who was instrumental in the creation of the SAT, believed in the superiority of certain races, a belief that influenced the design and implementation of these tests.
Shortly after the publication of “A Study of American Intelligence” in 1923, the College Board commissioned Carl Brigham to lead development of the SAT.
As the U.S. absorbed millions of immigrants, standardized tests were used to segregate and categorize students, often to their detriment. These biases have had lasting effects, contributing to educational disparities that persist today.
Modern Implications
Today, there is a growing movement to resist the overuse and misuse of standardized testing. Critics argue that these tests fail to accurately measure student learning and often exacerbate educational inequalities. Instead, there is a push for more authentic assessment methods that reflect a broader range of student skills and learning.
“The tests have failed time and again to achieve their intended purposes: measuring intelligence and predicting future academic and professional success. The tests, not the black test-takers, have been underachieving.” – Ibram X. Kendi
Efforts to reform these assessment systems are gaining traction, with educators and civil rights organizations advocating for changes that do not perpetuate racial and economic inequalities. As the National Education Association emphasizes, the focus should be on promoting assessments that support the academic, social, and emotional needs of students.
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Just 48 hours after NAR unveiled major revisions to its MLS policies, plaintiffs in the Michigan-based Hardy lawsuit moved to use those changes as evidence, arguing they prove NAR’s prior rules were anticompetitive. NAR denies any wrongdoing, but the case is quickly becoming a key test for whether MLS access should require Realtor membership — a question now echoing across multiple states and potentially reshaping how real estate professionals nationwide access the industry’s most essential tool.
Florida homeowners are now paying some of the highest insurance premiums in the country, with average costs topping $5,800 per year—nearly double the national average. Residents report skyrocketing rates, denied claims, and tough choices between costly coverage and financial risk. As frustration grows, lawmakers and consumer advocates are pushing new reforms aimed at increasing transparency, capping rate hikes, and protecting policyholders in one of the nation’s most volatile insurance markets.
Economic uncertainty, rapid AI adoption, tighter capital flows, and rising portfolio risk are reshaping the 2026 commercial real estate landscape. From shifting workforce patterns to a national housing attainability crisis, the industry is entering a data‑driven, fundamentals‑focused era—making adaptability, education, and tech literacy essential for real estate professionals.
Mortgage rates have climbed to 6.23 percent as investors grow doubtful that the Federal Reserve will deliver a rate cut in December. A soft but unclear jobs report and persistent inflation have pushed borrowing costs higher, reversing October’s brief relief in the housing market. Real estate and mortgage professionals should prepare clients for continued volatility as the Fed’s December meeting approaches.
After years of tight inventory, high mortgage rates, and sluggish sales, economists say 2026 is shaping up to be the turnaround real estate professionals have been waiting for. NAR projects a 14 percent jump in home sales, mortgage rates easing toward 6 percent, and buyer demand finally gaining momentum. While higher‑end homes are moving quickly, first‑time buyers continue to face affordability challenges, and price reductions are reappearing as sellers adjust to shifting conditions. For Florida agents, brokers, and newcomers, the stage is being set for a busy and opportunity‑rich year.
Florida’s average homeowner insurance premium has soared to $5,838 a year—almost $3,000 above the national average—pushing many residents to the financial brink. From tripled premiums to lowball claim payouts, homeowners are speaking out as frustration mounts. Some are even dropping coverage entirely. With more than 40% of claims closed without payment and policy cancellations at record levels, lawmakers are pushing for reforms, but political hurdles remain. The outcome could reshape Florida real estate, insurance, and mortgage markets for years to come.
