As families consider relocating, the quality of local public schools often becomes a pivotal factor. The allure of modern athletic facilities, spacious classrooms, and cutting-edge technology in science and computer labs can be irresistible for parents who equate these attributes with a superior education. But, as a recent study from Yale Insights explores, does the financial investment in school infrastructure genuinely enhance educational outcomes?
Barbara Biasi, an Assistant Professor of Economics at Yale SOM, alongside her colleagues Julien Lafortune and David Schönholzer, delved into this question. Their research, which spans data from across the United States, seeks to unravel the complex relationship between capital spending on schools and its impact on educational quality and real estate prices. For those interested in a deeper dive, the full article can be found here.
The study’s findings indicate that while capital projects generally increase both test scores and property values, the benefits are predominantly seen in districts with disadvantaged students. Interestingly, the type of capital project plays a crucial role in determining its impact. Projects focused on infrastructure improvements, such as HVAC systems, significantly enhance test scores but do not necessarily raise property values. Conversely, investments in visible amenities like athletic facilities tend to boost property prices.
Biasi’s research highlights a critical consideration for voters who decide on capital proposals. She emphasizes the importance of understanding whether these investments will truly benefit students or merely serve to increase local property values. As she notes, “Public schools are supposed to be free, but really people are paying for the best public school they can afford.”
Implications for Policy and Community
This study raises essential questions about the role of voters in making decisions that impact educational infrastructure. With the majority of voters not being parents, there’s a risk that the benefits of certain projects may not be fully appreciated or prioritized. Biasi hopes that this research will encourage a more informed discussion around school funding and its implications for both students and the broader community.
Looking ahead, Biasi and her team plan to explore how different funding rules across states affect the approval and impact of capital projects. This next phase aims to provide further insights into how modifications in funding rules could potentially reshape the educational landscape.
For more insights from Barbara Biasi and her team, visit her profile on Yale Insights.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Commercial real estate is entering a decade of major transformation driven by interest rate pressures, evolving work culture, rapid proptech innovation, and growing demand for AI-focused infrastructure. While the global CRE market is projected to reach $133.5 trillion by 2028, rising rates, shifting office demand, and increasing sustainability requirements are reshaping how professionals invest, manage, and develop properties. By 2030, the biggest opportunities will center on mixed‑use conversions, data center growth, premium office spaces, and ESG‑driven upgrades.
The National Association of Realtors’ landmark antitrust settlement is transforming how real estate agents negotiate compensation, work with buyers, and handle transparency in transactions. With MLS‑posted buyer‑broker commissions eliminated and written buyer agreements now required, both consumers and professionals are navigating a new, more transparent landscape. While commission levels have only dipped slightly, the real shift is in how openly compensation is discussed and negotiated—creating new challenges and opportunities for agents who adapt quickly.
Artificial intelligence is no longer a novelty in real estate — 2025 marks its breakthrough year as a dependable pillar of the proptech industry. With investors pouring capital into AI‑powered forecasting, security, automation, and property management tools, the sector is shifting from experimentation to full‑scale adoption. Brokerages, developers, and institutional players now rely on AI to streamline due diligence, enhance market modeling, reduce risk, and optimize building operations. As adoption accelerates, professionals who understand and leverage these technologies are gaining a decisive competitive edge in fast‑moving markets like Florida.
A new episode of Current Account breaks down why the insurance industry is heading into 2026 with more uncertainty — and more opportunity — than ever. From shifting global regulations and rising catastrophe risks to FSOC’s evolving role in the U.S., industry leaders Jérôme Haegeli and Philippe Brahin explain how insurers are being pushed to rethink strategy in real time. With global premium growth expected to slow and regulatory pressures rising, professionals in insurance and financial services are turning to education and new skills to stay ahead in a rapidly changing market.
New Jersey is quietly becoming one of the hottest commercial real estate markets in the nation, with Jersey City and North Jersey breaking into the top 10 in PwC’s 2026 Emerging Trends report. Fueled by redevelopment momentum, data‑center demand, mixed‑use transformations and a surge in health‑care projects, the state is drawing major investors while still battling rising construction costs and municipal fatigue. For real estate professionals, the Garden State’s evolution signals fresh opportunity—and a market worth watching closely heading into 2026.
The National Council of Insurance Legislators is pushing back against President Trump’s new executive order on artificial intelligence, arguing that it threatens decades of state‑based insurance oversight. NCOIL leaders say federal attempts to centralize AI authority could disrupt markets, weaken consumer protections, and limit states’ ability to innovate—setting the stage for a significant legal and political battle with major implications for insurance professionals who rely on AI‑driven tools and regulatory clarity.
