As families consider relocating, the quality of local public schools often becomes a pivotal factor. The allure of modern athletic facilities, spacious classrooms, and cutting-edge technology in science and computer labs can be irresistible for parents who equate these attributes with a superior education. But, as a recent study from Yale Insights explores, does the financial investment in school infrastructure genuinely enhance educational outcomes?
Barbara Biasi, an Assistant Professor of Economics at Yale SOM, alongside her colleagues Julien Lafortune and David Schönholzer, delved into this question. Their research, which spans data from across the United States, seeks to unravel the complex relationship between capital spending on schools and its impact on educational quality and real estate prices. For those interested in a deeper dive, the full article can be found here.
The study’s findings indicate that while capital projects generally increase both test scores and property values, the benefits are predominantly seen in districts with disadvantaged students. Interestingly, the type of capital project plays a crucial role in determining its impact. Projects focused on infrastructure improvements, such as HVAC systems, significantly enhance test scores but do not necessarily raise property values. Conversely, investments in visible amenities like athletic facilities tend to boost property prices.
Biasi’s research highlights a critical consideration for voters who decide on capital proposals. She emphasizes the importance of understanding whether these investments will truly benefit students or merely serve to increase local property values. As she notes, “Public schools are supposed to be free, but really people are paying for the best public school they can afford.”
Implications for Policy and Community
This study raises essential questions about the role of voters in making decisions that impact educational infrastructure. With the majority of voters not being parents, there’s a risk that the benefits of certain projects may not be fully appreciated or prioritized. Biasi hopes that this research will encourage a more informed discussion around school funding and its implications for both students and the broader community.
Looking ahead, Biasi and her team plan to explore how different funding rules across states affect the approval and impact of capital projects. This next phase aims to provide further insights into how modifications in funding rules could potentially reshape the educational landscape.
For more insights from Barbara Biasi and her team, visit her profile on Yale Insights.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Local elections across major U.S. cities have kicked off a wave of policy changes that could reshape development costs, rental income, and investment strategies heading into 2026. From NYC’s aggressive tenant‑protection agenda to Chicago’s sustainability push, Miami’s political uncertainty, and Boston’s steady zoning overhaul, the post‑election environment is redefining how real estate professionals, investors, and lenders should prepare for the year ahead.
Insurance carriers are rapidly rolling out AI-related exclusions that strip coverage from claims involving AI tools, automated decision‑making, or generative platforms like ChatGPT and Midjourney. With firms like Berkley and Hamilton introducing sweeping “absolute” and generative‑AI‑specific exclusions, professionals in real estate, mortgage, insurance, and finance now face new liability gaps. As AI becomes unavoidable in everyday work, understanding these exclusions is essential for protecting your career and staying compliant in a fast‑changing risk environment.
Proptech startup Venn has raised a $52 million Series B to unify the entire renting lifecycle into one intelligent platform, replacing over a dozen traditional systems and serving more than half a million tenants. As AI‑powered tools like Venn rapidly reshape property operations, real estate professionals — especially in fast‑moving markets like Florida — will need stronger education and tech‑savvy skills to stay competitive.
Florida’s Gulf Coast is undergoing a dramatic transformation as soaring insurance premiums, costly construction requirements, and the long shadow of Hurricane Ian force middle‑class families, workers, and longtime residents out of communities they once anchored. With premiums topping $5,700 a year — and many paying far more — Realtors warn of looming foreclosures, renters face steep increases, and entire neighborhoods are being rebuilt for wealthier newcomers. This mounting crisis is reshaping the state’s real estate landscape and leaving professionals scrambling to adapt.
Economic uncertainty, rapid tech advances and shifting population patterns are setting the stage for a pivotal year in commercial real estate. New findings from the Counselors of Real Estate, presented at NAR NXT, outline ten major forces reshaping strategy, investment and opportunity in 2026—from policy impacts and portfolio risk to AI adoption, capital flow changes, housing attainability and demographic shifts. This outlook offers clarity and caution for professionals across real estate, mortgage, finance and related fields.
Florida’s home insurance crisis is back in the spotlight as new reforms appear to be repeating decades‑old mistakes. Despite efforts to depopulate Citizens and attract private insurers, many of the companies taking over policies have ties to past insolvencies. Critics say weak oversight, generous ratings, and political influence are allowing unstable insurers to thrive while homeowners pay more for less protection. Experts warn that without transparent ratings, real accountability, and unified regulation, Florida’s insurance market will remain vulnerable—putting property values, lending, and the broader real estate industry at risk.
