As families consider relocating, the quality of local public schools often becomes a pivotal factor. The allure of modern athletic facilities, spacious classrooms, and cutting-edge technology in science and computer labs can be irresistible for parents who equate these attributes with a superior education. But, as a recent study from Yale Insights explores, does the financial investment in school infrastructure genuinely enhance educational outcomes?
Barbara Biasi, an Assistant Professor of Economics at Yale SOM, alongside her colleagues Julien Lafortune and David Schönholzer, delved into this question. Their research, which spans data from across the United States, seeks to unravel the complex relationship between capital spending on schools and its impact on educational quality and real estate prices. For those interested in a deeper dive, the full article can be found here.
The study’s findings indicate that while capital projects generally increase both test scores and property values, the benefits are predominantly seen in districts with disadvantaged students. Interestingly, the type of capital project plays a crucial role in determining its impact. Projects focused on infrastructure improvements, such as HVAC systems, significantly enhance test scores but do not necessarily raise property values. Conversely, investments in visible amenities like athletic facilities tend to boost property prices.
Biasi’s research highlights a critical consideration for voters who decide on capital proposals. She emphasizes the importance of understanding whether these investments will truly benefit students or merely serve to increase local property values. As she notes, “Public schools are supposed to be free, but really people are paying for the best public school they can afford.”
Implications for Policy and Community
This study raises essential questions about the role of voters in making decisions that impact educational infrastructure. With the majority of voters not being parents, there’s a risk that the benefits of certain projects may not be fully appreciated or prioritized. Biasi hopes that this research will encourage a more informed discussion around school funding and its implications for both students and the broader community.
Looking ahead, Biasi and her team plan to explore how different funding rules across states affect the approval and impact of capital projects. This next phase aims to provide further insights into how modifications in funding rules could potentially reshape the educational landscape.
For more insights from Barbara Biasi and her team, visit her profile on Yale Insights.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Just 48 hours after NAR unveiled major revisions to its MLS policies, plaintiffs in the Michigan-based Hardy lawsuit moved to use those changes as evidence, arguing they prove NAR’s prior rules were anticompetitive. NAR denies any wrongdoing, but the case is quickly becoming a key test for whether MLS access should require Realtor membership — a question now echoing across multiple states and potentially reshaping how real estate professionals nationwide access the industry’s most essential tool.
Florida homeowners are now paying some of the highest insurance premiums in the country, with average costs topping $5,800 per year—nearly double the national average. Residents report skyrocketing rates, denied claims, and tough choices between costly coverage and financial risk. As frustration grows, lawmakers and consumer advocates are pushing new reforms aimed at increasing transparency, capping rate hikes, and protecting policyholders in one of the nation’s most volatile insurance markets.
Economic uncertainty, rapid AI adoption, tighter capital flows, and rising portfolio risk are reshaping the 2026 commercial real estate landscape. From shifting workforce patterns to a national housing attainability crisis, the industry is entering a data‑driven, fundamentals‑focused era—making adaptability, education, and tech literacy essential for real estate professionals.
Mortgage rates have climbed to 6.23 percent as investors grow doubtful that the Federal Reserve will deliver a rate cut in December. A soft but unclear jobs report and persistent inflation have pushed borrowing costs higher, reversing October’s brief relief in the housing market. Real estate and mortgage professionals should prepare clients for continued volatility as the Fed’s December meeting approaches.
After years of tight inventory, high mortgage rates, and sluggish sales, economists say 2026 is shaping up to be the turnaround real estate professionals have been waiting for. NAR projects a 14 percent jump in home sales, mortgage rates easing toward 6 percent, and buyer demand finally gaining momentum. While higher‑end homes are moving quickly, first‑time buyers continue to face affordability challenges, and price reductions are reappearing as sellers adjust to shifting conditions. For Florida agents, brokers, and newcomers, the stage is being set for a busy and opportunity‑rich year.
Florida’s average homeowner insurance premium has soared to $5,838 a year—almost $3,000 above the national average—pushing many residents to the financial brink. From tripled premiums to lowball claim payouts, homeowners are speaking out as frustration mounts. Some are even dropping coverage entirely. With more than 40% of claims closed without payment and policy cancellations at record levels, lawmakers are pushing for reforms, but political hurdles remain. The outcome could reshape Florida real estate, insurance, and mortgage markets for years to come.
