In the heated arena of the U.S. presidential race, Vice President Kamala Harris has been making waves with her pointed critiques of former President Donald Trump’s business history. During a rally in Charlotte, North Carolina, on September 12, Harris unveiled her proposal for a $50,000 tax deduction aimed at small business startups. She then took a direct jab at Trump, asserting, “You know, not everybody started out with $400m on a silver platter and then filed for bankruptcy six times.”
Harris’s remarks have sparked a flurry of fact-checking, with many turning to a recent article from Al Jazeera that delves into the veracity of these claims. The article references a comprehensive 2018 analysis by The New York Times, revealing that Trump did indeed receive approximately $413 million from his father, Fred Trump, over his lifetime. However, this sum was not a single lump sum at the start of his career but rather dispersed over many years.
During a recent debate, Trump countered Harris’s claims, stating, “I wasn’t given $400m. I wish I was. My father was a Brooklyn builder. Brooklyn, Queens. And a great father, and I learned a lot from him. But I was given a fraction of that, a tiny fraction, and I built it into many, many billions of dollars.” The debate further intensified when Harris reiterated her points in a conversation hosted by Oprah Winfrey.
The Al Jazeera article also examines the claim of Trump’s six bankruptcies, confirming its accuracy. Trump’s financial struggles included high-profile bankruptcies such as the Trump Taj Mahal casino in 1991 and Trump Entertainment Resorts in 2009, among others. Experts have noted that while Trump did experience these financial setbacks, they are not uncommon in the business world.
Our Ruling
While Harris’s statement about Trump’s business beginnings contains elements of truth, it omits significant details. The New York Times investigation clarifies that Trump did not start his business career with $400 million readily available. Instead, he had the prospect of inheriting a portion of his father’s substantial real estate empire. This nuanced reality leads us to rate Harris’s statement as Half True.
Conclusion
As the presidential race progresses, the scrutiny of candidates’ claims remains crucial. Harris’s comments highlight the ongoing debate about wealth and privilege in America, while Trump’s rebuttal underscores the complexities of his business legacy. The full story, as always, is layered and multifaceted.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Tokenization has surged from crypto niche to global financial disruptor as institutions like Robinhood, BlackRock, and Coinbase race to digitize real-world assets. With pro‑crypto political momentum, shifting regulations, and private companies resisting newfound transparency, this emerging wave is transforming how investments are bought, sold, and accessed. For professionals in real estate, finance, lending, and insurance, this shift signals massive opportunity—and equally massive responsibility—as the next era of asset ownership takes shape.
Florida homeowners are finally getting relief as Citizens Property Insurance announces an average 8.7% statewide rate reduction for 2026, with South Florida seeing cuts as high as 14%. Driven by recent tort reforms and a stabilizing market, these decreases signal a major turnaround for an industry once on the brink of collapse — and a potential boost for real estate activity across the state.
After years of roller‑coaster chaos, the 2026 U.S. housing market is easing into something professionals haven’t seen in a long time: balance. Inventory growth has slowed to just 10% year over year—down sharply from 2025’s surge—signaling the end of the pandemic‑era scarcity and the rise of a market driven by real‑time demand and interest rates. With seasonal patterns returning, negotiations replacing bidding wars and rates drifting toward 6%, agents, lenders and investors are finally navigating conditions that look… normal.
More than half of Gen Z investors say they entered the stock market because of social media—not textbooks, not advisors. Viral creators, AI tools, and crypto trends are reshaping how young adults learn about money, invest early, and chase financial freedom. This Fortune‑featured shift highlights a generation determined to build wealth fast, trust digital voices over traditional institutions, and redefine financial education for the future.
After years of extremes, the U.S. housing market is shifting into a more balanced, predictable phase. Inventory growth has cooled from last year’s surge, seasonality is returning, and pricing is becoming increasingly rate‑sensitive. With mortgage rates hovering near 6% and policy changes reshaping investor participation, 2026 is emerging as a negotiation‑driven market where skilled agents, lenders, builders, and investors have a renewed advantage. This new landscape rewards strategy, education, and real‑time demand awareness—making it an ideal moment for professionals to refine their approach and capitalize on the market’s normalization.
A sudden policy shift at the start of 2026 is already pushing mortgage rates lower, dipping them under 6% for the first time in months. New projections suggest the government-sponsored enterprises’ $200 billion in mortgage‑backed securities purchases could accelerate rate declines throughout the year, boosting affordability, home sales, and overall market activity for buyers, sellers, and real estate professionals alike.
