As the digital age continues to reshape the landscape of healthcare, telemedicine stands out as a transformative force. During the COVID-19 pandemic, its use surged, offering a lifeline to patients and providers alike. But as we step beyond the pandemic’s shadow, the future of telemedicine hangs in the balance.
Dr. Mehrotra, a key figure among policymakers and researchers, is at the forefront of ensuring that telemedicine remains a viable option in the healthcare arsenal. The challenge is to integrate this technology without escalating costs, diminishing the quality of care, or overshadowing the indispensable role of in-person consultations.
Adapting to Change
Telemedicine’s meteoric rise during the pandemic was facilitated by flexible rules from both government and private insurers. Although the urgency of the pandemic has waned, the demand for telemedicine persists. Advances in technology, shifting preferences among patients and doctors, and new legislative frameworks have all contributed to this ongoing demand.
However, the path forward is fraught with questions. What are the best practices for telemedicine? How should it be integrated into the broader U.S. healthcare system? These questions are critical as we consider the impending expiration of certain Medicare and Medicaid policies in December 2024.
Medicare Telehealth Services
For Medicare, the decision to extend, amend, or extinguish telemedicine access is a delicate balancing act between costs and benefits. Dr. Mehrotra’s research, published in Health Affairs, offers a comprehensive analysis of telemedicine’s impact on a national scale. His findings suggest that the temporary rules facilitating remote healthcare should become permanent, given the modest increase in spending and improved access to care.
Cost-Benefit Analysis for U.S. Health Systems
In 2021 and 2022, health systems with high telemedicine use saw a 2.2% increase in visits but a 2.7% decrease in non-COVID-19 emergency visits. While spending increased slightly, patients were more compliant with medication regimens for chronic conditions. These insights reinforce the value of telemedicine, a sentiment echoed in studies on mental health and pediatrics.
Protecting In-Person Practices, Preserving Access to Care
In his testimony before Congress, Dr. Mehrotra recommended lower payment rates for telehealth visits compared to in-person visits, to ensure the competitiveness of traditional practices. He also advocated for the removal of in-person visit requirements for mental health telemedicine appointments, recognizing the shift to virtual-only practices among many clinicians.
Telemedicine Care Across State Lines
One of the thorniest issues is the restriction on telemedicine across state lines. Current regulations often prevent patients from accessing care from their regular doctors when out of state. Dr. Mehrotra’s work highlights the need for federal laws to allow telemedicine across state borders, safeguarding the continuity of care.
New Ways of Practicing Medicine
The evolution of telemedicine is not just about video calls. It’s about reimagining how care is delivered, whether through secure messaging or remote monitoring technologies. As Dr. Mehrotra points out, the challenge lies in navigating these advances to enhance patient care while ensuring fair compensation for providers.
As we stand on the cusp of a new era in healthcare, the potential of telemedicine is immense. But to realize this potential, we must establish the right rules and frameworks. The stakes are high, but the promise of a more accessible, efficient healthcare system is within reach.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Long Island’s commercial real estate market just smashed every previous record, hitting an unprecedented $4.1 billion in 2025 deal volume—up a massive 71.5 percent from the year before. A surge in specialty-use properties like assisted living centers and self-storage facilities fueled the boom, alongside hundreds of new transactions across Nassau and Suffolk counties. With investor confidence rebounding, interest rates easing, and new buyer profiles entering the scene, the region has become one of the hottest real estate markets to watch.
Federal cuts to housing oversight in 2026 are creating a nationwide regulatory scramble, with states—especially California—rapidly stepping in to fill the gap. As the CFPB reduces its enforcement role, lawmakers and agencies across the country are crafting their own rules on mortgage compliance, consumer protection, affordability, and even AI‑driven underwriting. For real estate, mortgage, and finance professionals, the message is clear: state regulations are becoming just as influential as federal policy, making ongoing education and compliance awareness more critical than ever.
The insurance industry poured an eye‑opening $172 million into federal lobbying in 2025, making it the fourth‑largest lobbying sector in the country. Medical insurers led the spending, but property and casualty giants weren’t far behind, with APCIA, Nationwide, Liberty Mutual, and Allstate all landing among the top contributors. And this is only federal spending—state‑level influence, where regulations are truly shaped, remains vastly underreported. For professionals in insurance, real estate, and finance, these lobbying efforts play a powerful role in shaping regulations, costs, and the competitive landscape.
Florida’s home insurance market saw a 3.35% non-renewal rate last year—a small percentage that translated into hundreds of thousands of homeowners suddenly losing coverage. Driven by repeated storm damage, soaring construction costs, heavy litigation, and insurers pulling back from high-risk areas, the state’s insurance landscape is rapidly shifting. Homeowners now face higher premiums, fewer options, and tougher underwriting, while professionals in real estate, mortgage, and insurance must stay informed to guide clients through a tightening market.
Florida’s recent tort reforms are doing far more than reshaping the state’s legal system—they’re driving down property and casualty insurance costs by an average of 14.5% and injecting over $4.2 billion into the state’s economy each year. With nearly 30,000 jobs supported and state and local governments seeing hundreds of millions in new tax revenue, the changes are already transforming Florida’s insurance market. Lawsuits have dropped, insurers are returning, and businesses and homeowners alike are reaping the benefits of a more balanced, competitive, and financially resilient environment.
Major commercial real estate firms are reporting strong revenue and renewed market activity, signaling a rebound in dealmaking and office demand. Yet even with record earnings, CEOs from CBRE, Colliers, and Marcus & Millichap spent much of their earnings calls addressing a growing concern: whether artificial intelligence could threaten traditional brokerage and valuation roles. While leaders insist that complex transactions still rely on human relationships and negotiation, AI‑related market jitters briefly pushed some CRE stocks down before they recovered.
As we stand on the cusp of a new era in healthcare, the potential of telemedicine is immense. But to realize this potential, we must establish the right rules and frameworks. The stakes are high, but the promise of a more accessible, efficient healthcare system is within reach.
