As families consider relocating, the quality of local public schools often becomes a pivotal factor. The allure of modern athletic facilities, spacious classrooms, and cutting-edge technology in science and computer labs can be irresistible for parents who equate these attributes with a superior education. But, as a recent study from Yale Insights explores, does the financial investment in school infrastructure genuinely enhance educational outcomes?
Barbara Biasi, an Assistant Professor of Economics at Yale SOM, alongside her colleagues Julien Lafortune and David Schönholzer, delved into this question. Their research, which spans data from across the United States, seeks to unravel the complex relationship between capital spending on schools and its impact on educational quality and real estate prices. For those interested in a deeper dive, the full article can be found here.
The study’s findings indicate that while capital projects generally increase both test scores and property values, the benefits are predominantly seen in districts with disadvantaged students. Interestingly, the type of capital project plays a crucial role in determining its impact. Projects focused on infrastructure improvements, such as HVAC systems, significantly enhance test scores but do not necessarily raise property values. Conversely, investments in visible amenities like athletic facilities tend to boost property prices.
Biasi’s research highlights a critical consideration for voters who decide on capital proposals. She emphasizes the importance of understanding whether these investments will truly benefit students or merely serve to increase local property values. As she notes, “Public schools are supposed to be free, but really people are paying for the best public school they can afford.”
Implications for Policy and Community
This study raises essential questions about the role of voters in making decisions that impact educational infrastructure. With the majority of voters not being parents, there’s a risk that the benefits of certain projects may not be fully appreciated or prioritized. Biasi hopes that this research will encourage a more informed discussion around school funding and its implications for both students and the broader community.
Looking ahead, Biasi and her team plan to explore how different funding rules across states affect the approval and impact of capital projects. This next phase aims to provide further insights into how modifications in funding rules could potentially reshape the educational landscape.
For more insights from Barbara Biasi and her team, visit her profile on Yale Insights.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
A growing share of American homeowners now carry mortgage rates above 5%—a dramatic shift that’s reshaping refinancing, inventory, and buyer behavior nationwide. With more than 30% of borrowers locked into rates over 5% and 20% above 6%, the market is split between owners holding on to low pandemic‑era loans and new buyers taking on higher‑rate mortgages. Federal efforts to push rates down could unlock millions of refinancing opportunities, while buyers see only modest monthly savings. For real estate professionals, understanding these rate dynamics is crucial as they increasingly drive inventory levels, affordability, and market activity.
New Moody’s data shows commercial real estate deal volume slipped 20% in December, marking a second monthly decline. Yet the full year tells a different story: 2025 ended with a 17% gain, signaling a quiet but resilient recovery. The biggest surprise came from the office sector, which posted a 21% jump in activity as return‑to‑office trends and AI‑driven job growth boosted demand. Multifamily, retail, and alternative assets like data centers also saw strong momentum, giving real estate professionals a market full of fresh opportunities heading into 2026.
Florida drivers and industry professionals are heading into 2026 with good news: auto insurance rates are dropping across the state as the market shows strong signs of stabilization. USAA leads the latest wave with a 7% average rate decrease expected in May 2026, saving members more than $125 million annually. They join several major insurers — including State Farm, Progressive, AAA, Allstate, and Florida Farm Bureau — all approving significant reductions. Officials credit recent legislative reforms, especially tort reform, for the improved loss ratios and renewed insurer confidence. With both auto and home insurance markets strengthening, Florida’s real estate, mortgage, and insurance professionals can expect more consumer confidence, smoother transactions, and expanding career opportunities.
New data from Eye On Housing and the NAHB shows the U.S. remains short more than 1.2 million housing units, keeping pressure on both rents and home prices. Record‑low vacancy rates, slow single‑family construction, and restrictive zoning continue to fuel intense competition in 2024. Major metros like Chicago, New York, and Atlanta face some of the deepest deficits, and the true nationwide shortfall may be even higher when accounting for overcrowding and aging homes. For real estate professionals, the ongoing shortage means sustained demand, tighter inventory, and major opportunities for those who understand the evolving market.
Top real estate coach Jason Pantana says the divide between agents today isn’t about who has “tried” AI — it’s about who is immersed in it. In a new HousingWire interview, he explains why AI isn’t a gimmick but a full business system that amplifies output, improves authenticity, and reshapes how clients search for agents. From prompt mastery to AI‑driven visibility on Google, Pantana reveals how agents who commit even 15 minutes a day to learning AI are already outperforming those who hesitate.
Dallas–Fort Worth’s commercial real estate market closed 2025 with a split personality. Industrial dominated with massive new deliveries and soaring leasing demand, retail held steady with some of the market’s strongest fundamentals in years, and office continued to falter under remote‑work pressures. High vacancies, weak absorption, and rising demand for top‑tier space show the sector’s ongoing reset. Meanwhile, industrial and retail strength position the Metroplex for another powerhouse year heading into 2026.
