As families consider relocating, the quality of local public schools often becomes a pivotal factor. The allure of modern athletic facilities, spacious classrooms, and cutting-edge technology in science and computer labs can be irresistible for parents who equate these attributes with a superior education. But, as a recent study from Yale Insights explores, does the financial investment in school infrastructure genuinely enhance educational outcomes?
Barbara Biasi, an Assistant Professor of Economics at Yale SOM, alongside her colleagues Julien Lafortune and David Schönholzer, delved into this question. Their research, which spans data from across the United States, seeks to unravel the complex relationship between capital spending on schools and its impact on educational quality and real estate prices. For those interested in a deeper dive, the full article can be found here.
The study’s findings indicate that while capital projects generally increase both test scores and property values, the benefits are predominantly seen in districts with disadvantaged students. Interestingly, the type of capital project plays a crucial role in determining its impact. Projects focused on infrastructure improvements, such as HVAC systems, significantly enhance test scores but do not necessarily raise property values. Conversely, investments in visible amenities like athletic facilities tend to boost property prices.
Biasi’s research highlights a critical consideration for voters who decide on capital proposals. She emphasizes the importance of understanding whether these investments will truly benefit students or merely serve to increase local property values. As she notes, “Public schools are supposed to be free, but really people are paying for the best public school they can afford.”
Implications for Policy and Community
This study raises essential questions about the role of voters in making decisions that impact educational infrastructure. With the majority of voters not being parents, there’s a risk that the benefits of certain projects may not be fully appreciated or prioritized. Biasi hopes that this research will encourage a more informed discussion around school funding and its implications for both students and the broader community.
Looking ahead, Biasi and her team plan to explore how different funding rules across states affect the approval and impact of capital projects. This next phase aims to provide further insights into how modifications in funding rules could potentially reshape the educational landscape.
For more insights from Barbara Biasi and her team, visit her profile on Yale Insights.
More Articles
Getting licensed or staying ahead in your career can be a journey—but it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Grab your favorite coffee or tea, take a moment to relax, and browse through our articles. Whether you’re just starting out or renewing your expertise, we’ve got tips, insights, and advice to keep you moving forward. Here’s to your success—one sip and one step at a time!
Flood insurance premiums across Florida are climbing fast, with more than 80% of NFIP policyholders seeing annual increases under FEMA’s Risk Rating 2.0. Some counties now face hikes exceeding $3,500 per year, adding pressure in a state where homeowners insurance already averages nearly $11,000 annually. As risk-based pricing takes hold and climate impacts intensify, Florida homeowners — and the real estate pros who advise them — must prepare for continued premium growth and major county‑to‑county disparities.
As insurers step into 2026, the property and casualty market shows its first signs of real stability after several turbulent years. Q4 results reveal disciplined underwriting, cooling rate hikes, and steady premium growth across major carriers. Commercial lines show selective momentum, personal lines begin to level out, and AI-driven efficiency becomes the industry’s new engine for profitability. With catastrophe losses moderating and tech adoption accelerating, professionals across insurance, real estate, and finance can expect a pivotal year—and an ideal moment to sharpen their skills through continuing education.
A new CBRE survey shows that most U.S. commercial real estate investors expect to increase their property purchases in 2026, signaling renewed confidence and market stabilization. Dallas remains the nation’s top target for the fifth straight year, followed by high‑growth metros like Atlanta, San Francisco, Miami, Charlotte, Raleigh‑Durham, Nashville, Tampa, Seattle, and New York City. These cities continue to draw strong investor interest due to population growth, business expansion, and robust development activity.
Florida Insurance Commissioner Michael Yaworsky says the state's turbulent property insurance market is finally calming, with Florida posting the lowest rate increases in the nation last year. Yet rising home replacement costs mean many homeowners won’t see relief in their premiums just yet. With Citizens Insurance shrinking, new legislative priorities emerging, and long‑term reforms taking hold, Florida’s real estate and insurance professionals are entering 2026 with cautious optimism and a clearer picture of what’s ahead.
A new CBRE survey shows investor optimism surging as 95% plan to buy more or the same amount of commercial real estate in 2026, with over half increasing their capital allocation. Stabilizing values, improving fundamentals, and expected relief in debt costs are driving renewed confidence, putting markets like Dallas, Atlanta, and Tampa in the spotlight as multifamily and industrial assets lead demand.
Artificial intelligence has moved from industry buzzword to essential mortgage‑lending tool, reshaping how loan officers work, communicate and compete. From smarter lead targeting to rapid content creation and CRM‑powered automation, AI is now the dividing line between lenders who scale efficiently and those stuck in manual workflows. This article breaks down why AI adoption is no longer optional, how top lenders are using it and what mortgage professionals must do now to stay competitive.
